Mail Index
This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 50 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 50 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.
- thread-safe interfaces
- character strings versus byte strings
- Re: character strings versus byte strings
- Re: character strings versus byte strings
- Couple things...
- Re: character strings versus byte strings
- From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- GC safety and return values
- Re: GC safety and return values
- Re: GC safety and return values
- Strings/chars
- Re: character strings versus byte strings
- Re: Strings/chars
- Re: character strings versus byte strings
- From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: GC safety and return values
- From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: GC safety and return values
- Re: character strings versus byte strings
- Re: character strings versus byte strings
- From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: character strings versus byte strings
- passing C data to Scheme world
- Re: character strings versus byte strings
- Re: character strings versus byte strings
- Re: character strings versus byte strings
- Re: character strings versus byte strings
- From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: character strings versus byte strings
- From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: character strings versus byte strings
- Re: Couple things...
- Re: Strings/chars
- Re: thread-safe interfaces
- Re: character strings versus byte strings
- Re: character strings versus byte strings
- From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: Couple things...
- From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: Couple things...
- Re: Strings/chars
- Re: character strings versus byte strings
- Re: character strings versus byte strings
- Re: Couple things...
- Re: Strings/chars
- Re: GC safety and return values
- more on GC issues
- handling multiple scheme instances
- no constants please
- non-local exits are icky
- maybe pika
- Re: no constants please
- From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: handling multiple scheme instances
- Re: handling multiple scheme instances
- From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: Strings/chars
- Re: Couple things...
- Re: Strings/chars
- Re: Strings/chars
- Re: GC safety and return values
- Re: Couple things...
- Re: Couple things...
- Re: Couple things...
- Re: Couple things...
- Re: GC safety and return values
- Re: GC safety and return values
- Re: GC safety and return values
- target applications
- Simplified, Limited, Easy FFI: Useful?
- Re: Simplified, Limited, Easy FFI: Useful?
- Re: Simplified, Limited, Easy FFI: Useful?
- Re: GC safety and return values
- From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: target applications
- From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: GC safety and return values
- Re: thread-safe interfaces [correction]
- Re: Couple things...
- From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: target applications
- Re: target applications
- general
- Re: Couple things...
- Re: GC safety and return values
- Re: GC safety and return values
- Re: non-local exits are icky
- Re: maybe pika
- Re: target applications
- Re: GC safety and return values
- Re: GC safety and return values
- Re: non-local exits are icky
- Re: non-local exits are icky
- Re: no constants please
- flow of control issues
- Re: maybe pika
- numeric ranges and errors
- Re: non-local exits are icky
- Re: no constants please
- Re: maybe pika
- Re: GC safety and return values
- Re: GC safety and return values
- Re: handling multiple scheme instances
- Re: non-local exits are icky
- Re: no constants please
- Re: flow of control issues
- Re: passing C data to Scheme world
- Re: non-local exits are icky
- Re: non-local exits are icky
- Re: Couple things...
- Re: handling multiple scheme instances
- Re: no constants please
- Re: flow of control issues
- Re: Couple things...
- From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: Couple things...
- Re: Couple things...
- Re: Couple things...
- Re: Couple things...
- From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: Couple things...
- Re: non-local exits are icky
- Re: Couple things...
- From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: Couple things...
- Re: non-local exits are icky
- Re: no constants please
- Re: no constants please
- From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: no constants please
- Re: non-local exits are icky
- misc
- Re: Couple things...
- Re: Couple things...
- Re: no constants please
- Re: no constants please
- Re: no constants please
- Re: no constants please
- Re: no constants please
- Re: no constants please
- Re: no constants please
- Re: no constants please
- Re: no constants please
- From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: no constants please
- Re: no constants please
- Re: no constants please
- Re: no constants please
- Re: no constants please
- Re: no constants please
- From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- null-terminated strings vs. strings with length
- Re: Couple things...
- Re: non-local exits are icky
- Re: Couple things...
- Re: Couple things...
- Re: no constants please
- Re: non-local exits are icky
- Re: no constants please
- Re: Couple things...
- Re: Couple things...
- Re: no constants please
- Re: no constants please
- Re: no constants please
- Re: no constants please
- Re: Couple things...
- Re: no constants please
- Re: no constants please
- I don't believe in "(may GC)"
- Re: no constants please
- Re: no constants please
- Re: no constants please
- Re: no constants please
- Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)"
- Re: no constants please
- Re: null-terminated strings vs. strings with length
- Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)"
- Re: no constants please
- Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)"
- Re: no constants please
- Re: no constants please
- Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)"
- Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)"
- Re: no constants please
- Re: no constants please
- Re: no constants please
- Re: Couple things...
- Re: Couple things...
- Pika-style from first principles
- Re: Couple things...
- Re: no constants please
- Re: no constants please
- From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)"
- From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: no constants please
- Re: no constants please
- Re: no constants please
- From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: no constants please
- Re: no constants please
- From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: no constants please
- Performance
- Portability
- Re: Portability
- Restrictions
- Re: Restrictions
- Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)"
- Re: no constants please
- Re: Restrictions
- Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)"
- Reliability
- Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)"
- Re: Restrictions
- Re: Restrictions
- Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)"
- Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)"
- Re: Restrictions
- Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)"
- A note on process
- Re: Restrictions
- Re: A note on process
- Re: A note on process
- Re: A note on process
- Re: A note on process
- Re: A note on process
- Re: Pika-style from first principles
- Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)"
- scheme_lookup_imported_binding
- Re: no constants please
- Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)"
- From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)"
- Re: no constants please
- Re: Pika-style from first principles
- Re: Couple things...
- Re: A note on process
- Re: no constants please
- Re: Pika-style from first principles
- Re: Pika-style from first principles
- when GC is permitted
- Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)"
- Re: when GC is permitted
- Re: when GC is permitted
- Re: when GC is permitted
- Re: when GC is permitted
- Re: when GC is permitted
- Re: when GC is permitted
- Re: Strings/chars
- Re: Couple things...
- Re: when GC is permitted
- Re: when GC is permitted
- Re: Strings/chars
- Re: Couple things...
- Re: when GC is permitted
- Re: when GC is permitted
- Re: when GC is permitted
- Re: when GC is permitted
- Re: Strings/chars
- Re: Couple things...
- Re: when GC is permitted
- Re: when GC is permitted
- Re: Couple things...
- Re: Pika-style from first principles
- Re: when GC is permitted
- Re: Strings/chars
- Re: Couple things...
- From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: Strings/chars
- From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: when GC is permitted
- Re: when GC is permitted
- Re: Strings/chars
- Re: Strings/chars
- From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: when GC is permitted
- Re: Couple things...
- Re: when GC is permitted
- Re: when GC is permitted
- Re: Couple things...
- Oh.
- Re: Couple things...
- Re: Pika-style from first principles
- Re: Pika-style from first principles
- Re: Pika-style from first principles
- Re: when GC is permitted
- Re: when GC is permitted
- Re: Pika-style from first principles
- Re: when GC is permitted
- Re: when GC is permitted
- Re: when GC is permitted
- Re: when GC is permitted
- Re: when GC is permitted
- Re: when GC is permitted
- Re: when GC is permitted
- Re: when GC is permitted
- Re: when GC is permitted
- Re: when GC is permitted
- Re: when GC is permitted
- Re: when GC is permitted
- Re: when GC is permitted
- From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: when GC is permitted
- Re: when GC is permitted
- From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: when GC is permitted
- Re: when GC is permitted
- Re: Pika-style from first principles
- Re: when GC is permitted
- Re: when GC is permitted
- Re: when GC is permitted
- temporarily withdrawing SRFI-50
- Re: when GC is permitted
- Re: when GC is permitted
- Re: when GC is permitted
- From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: temporarily withdrawing SRFI-50
- From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: temporarily withdrawing SRFI-50
- Re: when GC is permitted
- Re: when GC is permitted
- From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: when GC is permitted
- Re: Pika-style from first principles
- Re: Pika-style from first principles
- Re: temporarily withdrawing SRFI-50
- Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style
- Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style
- Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style
- Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style
- Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style
- Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style
- Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style
- Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style
- Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style
- Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style
- Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style
- Re: temporarily withdrawing SRFI-50
- Re: when GC is permitted
- Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style
- Re: when GC is permitted
- Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style
- Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style
- Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style
- Re: when GC is permitted
- Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style
- Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style
- Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style
- Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style
- Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style
- Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style
- Re: when GC is permitted
- Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style
- Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style
- Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style
- Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style
- Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style
- Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style
- Re: when GC is permitted
- Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style
- Re: when GC is permitted
- kind request for a sync()
- Re: when GC is permitted
- Re: when GC is permitted
- Re: when GC is permitted
- Re: Couple things...
- Re: Couple things...
- Re: Couple things...
- Re: Couple things...
- Re: Couple things...
- Re: Couple things...
- Re: Couple things...
- Re: Couple things...
- strings draft
- Re: strings draft
- Re: strings draft
- Re: strings draft
- Re: strings draft
- Re: strings draft
- From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: strings draft
- Re: strings draft
- Re: strings draft
- From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: strings draft
- From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: strings draft
- Re: strings draft
- Re: strings draft
- Re: strings draft
- Re: strings draft
- From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: strings draft
- From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: strings draft
- From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: strings draft
- Re: strings draft
- Re: strings draft
- Re: strings draft
- From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: strings draft
- From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: strings draft
- From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: strings draft
- READ-OCTET (Re: strings draft)
- Re: strings draft
- Re: strings draft
- Re: strings draft
- Re: strings draft (musings)
- Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft]
- Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft]
- Re: strings draft
- From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft]
- From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: strings draft
- From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft]
- Re: strings draft
- Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft]
- Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft]
- Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft]
- Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft]
- From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: strings draft
- Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft]
- Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft]
- Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft]
- Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft]
- Re: strings draft
- Re: strings draft
- Re: strings draft
- Re: strings draft
- Re: strings draft
- Re: strings draft
- Re: strings draft
- Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft]
- From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft]
- Re: strings draft
- Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft]
- From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: strings draft (premature, need first class type definition support first?)
- Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft]
- Re: strings draft (premature, need first class type definition support first?)
- Re: strings draft
- Re: strings draft (premature, need first class type definition support first?)
- Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft]
- Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft]
- Re: strings draft
- Re: strings draft
- Re: strings draft
- Re: strings draft
- Re: strings draft
- Re: strings draft
- Re: strings draft
- Re: strings draft
- Re: strings draft
- Re: strings draft
- Re: strings draft
- Octet vs Char (Re: strings draft)
- Re: Octet vs Char (Re: strings draft)
- Re: Octet vs Char (Re: strings draft)
- Re: Octet vs Char (Re: strings draft)
- Re: Octet vs Char
- Re: strings draft
- proposed srfi for extended character sets
- Re: strings draft
- Re: Octet vs Char (Re: strings draft)
- Re: Octet vs Char (Re: strings draft)
- Re: Octet vs Char
- Re: Octet vs Char
- Re: Octet vs Char (Re: strings draft)
- Re: Octet vs Char
- Re: Octet vs Char (Re: strings draft)
- Re: Octet vs Char (Re: strings draft)
- Strings, one last detail.
- Clarification of SCHEME_GC_PROTECT/SCHEME_GC_UNPROTECT
- Re: Strings, one last detail.
- Re: Strings, one last detail.
- Re: Strings, one last detail.
- Re: Strings, one last detail.
- Re: Strings, one last detail.
- Re: Strings, one last detail.
- Re: Strings, one last detail.
- Re: strings draft
- Re: strings draft
- Unicode and Scheme
- Re: Unicode and Scheme
- Re: Unicode and Scheme (tweaked)
- Re: Unicode and Scheme (tweaked)
- Re: strings draft
- Re: Unicode and Scheme (tweaked)
- specifying source encoding (Re: strings draft)
- Re: strings draft
- Permitting and Supporting Extended Character Sets: response.
- Re: Unicode and Scheme
- Re: Permitting and Supporting Extended Character Sets: response.
- Re: Unicode and Scheme
- Re: Permitting and Supporting Extended Character Sets: response.
- Re: Unicode and Scheme
- Re: Permitting and Supporting Extended Character Sets: response.
- Re: Permitting and Supporting Extended Character Sets: response.
- Re: Permitting and Supporting Extended Character Sets: response.
- Re: Encodings.
- More JNI vs. Pika comparison
- Re: More JNI vs. Pika comparison
- Re: More JNI vs. Pika comparison
- Re: More JNI vs. Pika comparison
- Re: More JNI vs. Pika comparison
- Re: More JNI vs. Pika comparison
- Re: More JNI vs. Pika comparison
- Re: More JNI vs. Pika comparison
- Re: More JNI vs. Pika comparison
- Re: Clarification of SCHEME_GC_PROTECT/SCHEME_GC_UNPROTECT
Mail converted by MHonArc