Mail Index

• Thread Index

• thread-safe interfaces
  • From: Jim Blandy
• character strings versus byte strings
  • From: Matthew Flatt
• Re: character strings versus byte strings
  • From: Per Bothner
• Re: character strings versus byte strings
  • From: Matthew Flatt
• Couple things...
  • From: felix
• Re: character strings versus byte strings
  • From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• GC safety and return values
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: GC safety and return values
  • From: Jim Blandy
• Re: GC safety and return values
  • From: Tom Lord
• Strings/chars
  • From: Shiro Kawai
• Re: character strings versus byte strings
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: Strings/chars
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: character strings versus byte strings
  • From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• Re: GC safety and return values
  • From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• Re: GC safety and return values
  • From: Jim Blandy
• Re: character strings versus byte strings
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: character strings versus byte strings
  • From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• Re: character strings versus byte strings
  • From: Shiro Kawai
• passing C data to Scheme world
  • From: Shiro Kawai
• Re: character strings versus byte strings
  • From: bear
• Re: character strings versus byte strings
  • From: bear
• Re: character strings versus byte strings
  • From: bear
• Re: character strings versus byte strings
  • From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• Re: character strings versus byte strings
  • From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• Re: character strings versus byte strings
  • From: bear
• Re: Couple things...
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Re: Strings/chars
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Re: thread-safe interfaces
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Re: character strings versus byte strings
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Re: character strings versus byte strings
  • From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• Re: Couple things...
  • From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• Re: Couple things...
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Re: Strings/chars
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Re: character strings versus byte strings
  • From: bear
• Re: character strings versus byte strings
  • From: Bradd W. Szonye
• Re: Couple things...
  • From: Jim Blandy
• Re: Strings/chars
  • From: Shiro Kawai
• Re: GC safety and return values
  • From: Tom Lord
• more on GC issues
  • From: Tom Lord
• handling multiple scheme instances
  • From: Tom Lord
• no constants please
  • From: Tom Lord
• non-local exits are icky
  • From: Tom Lord
• maybe pika
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: no constants please
  • From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• Re: handling multiple scheme instances
  • From: Shiro Kawai
• Re: handling multiple scheme instances
  • From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• Re: Strings/chars
  • From: bear
• Re: Couple things...
  • From: Per Bothner
• Re: Strings/chars
  • From: Alex Shinn
• Re: Strings/chars
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: GC safety and return values
  • From: Jim Blandy
• Re: Couple things...
  • From: felix
• Re: Couple things...
  • From: felix
• Re: Couple things...
  • From: felix
• Re: Couple things...
  • From: Jim Blandy
• Re: GC safety and return values
  • From: Jim Blandy
• Re: GC safety and return values
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: GC safety and return values
  • From: Tom Lord
• target applications
  • From: Tom Lord
• Simplified, Limited, Easy FFI: Useful?
  • From: bear
• Re: Simplified, Limited, Easy FFI: Useful?
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: Simplified, Limited, Easy FFI: Useful?
  • From: bear
• Re: GC safety and return values
  • From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• Re: target applications
  • From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• Re: GC safety and return values
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: thread-safe interfaces [correction]
  • From: Jim Blandy
• Re: Couple things...
  • From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• Re: target applications
  • From: Jim Blandy
• Re: target applications
  • From: Tom Lord
• general
  • From: cr88192
• Re: Couple things...
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Re: GC safety and return values
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Re: GC safety and return values
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Re: non-local exits are icky
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Re: maybe pika
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Re: target applications
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Re: GC safety and return values
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: GC safety and return values
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: non-local exits are icky
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: non-local exits are icky
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Re: no constants please
  • From: Michael Sperber
• flow of control issues
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: maybe pika
  • From: Tom Lord
• numeric ranges and errors
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: non-local exits are icky
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: no constants please
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: maybe pika
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: GC safety and return values
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Re: GC safety and return values
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Re: handling multiple scheme instances
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Re: non-local exits are icky
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Re: no constants please
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Re: flow of control issues
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Re: passing C data to Scheme world
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Re: non-local exits are icky
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: non-local exits are icky
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Re: Couple things...
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Re: handling multiple scheme instances
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: no constants please
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: flow of control issues
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: Couple things...
  • From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• Re: Couple things...
  • From: felix
• Re: Couple things...
  • From: felix
• Re: Couple things...
  • From: felix
• Re: Couple things...
  • From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• Re: Couple things...
  • From: felix
• Re: non-local exits are icky
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: Couple things...
  • From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• Re: Couple things...
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Re: non-local exits are icky
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Re: no constants please
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Re: no constants please
  • From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• Re: no constants please
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: non-local exits are icky
  • From: Tom Lord
• misc
  • From: cr88192
• Re: Couple things...
  • From: felix
• Re: Couple things...
  • From: felix
• Re: no constants please
  • From: Richard Kelsey
• Re: no constants please
  • From: bear
• Re: no constants please
  • From: Ken Dickey
• Re: no constants please
  • From: Richard Kelsey
• Re: no constants please
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: no constants please
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: no constants please
  • From: Richard Kelsey
• Re: no constants please
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: no constants please
  • From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• Re: no constants please
  • From: bear
• Re: no constants please
  • From: Richard Kelsey
• Re: no constants please
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: no constants please
  • From: Richard Kelsey
• Re: no constants please
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: no constants please
  • From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• null-terminated strings vs. strings with length
  • From: Sebastian Egner
• Re: Couple things...
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Re: non-local exits are icky
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Re: Couple things...
  • From: bear
• Re: Couple things...
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Re: no constants please
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: non-local exits are icky
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: no constants please
  • From: Richard Kelsey
• Re: Couple things...
  • From: felix
• Re: Couple things...
  • From: felix
• Re: no constants please
  • From: felix
• Re: no constants please
  • From: Richard Kelsey
• Re: no constants please
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: no constants please
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: Couple things...
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: no constants please
  • From: Richard Kelsey
• Re: no constants please
  • From: Tom Lord
• I don't believe in "(may GC)"
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: no constants please
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: no constants please
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: no constants please
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: no constants please
  • From: Richard Kelsey
• Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)"
  • From: Richard Kelsey
• Re: no constants please
  • From: Richard Kelsey
• Re: null-terminated strings vs. strings with length
  • From: Richard Kelsey
• Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)"
  • From: Shiro Kawai
• Re: no constants please
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)"
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: no constants please
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: no constants please
  • From: Richard Kelsey
• Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)"
  • From: bear
• Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)"
  • From: bear
• Re: no constants please
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: no constants please
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Re: no constants please
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Re: Couple things...
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Re: Couple things...
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Pika-style from first principles
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: Couple things...
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: no constants please
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: no constants please
  • From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)"
  • From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• Re: no constants please
  • From: Richard Kelsey
• Re: no constants please
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: no constants please
  • From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• Re: no constants please
  • From: Richard Kelsey
• Re: no constants please
  • From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• Re: no constants please
  • From: Tom Lord
• Performance
  • From: Felix Winkelmann
• Portability
  • From: Felix Winkelmann
• Re: Portability
  • From: Felix Winkelmann
• Restrictions
  • From: Felix Winkelmann
• Re: Restrictions
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)"
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Re: no constants please
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Re: Restrictions
  • From: Felix Winkelmann
• Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)"
  • From: Felix Winkelmann
• Reliability
  • From: Felix Winkelmann
• Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)"
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Re: Restrictions
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Re: Restrictions
  • From: Felix Winkelmann
• Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)"
  • From: Felix Winkelmann
• Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)"
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Re: Restrictions
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)"
  • From: Felix Winkelmann
• A note on process
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Re: Restrictions
  • From: Felix Winkelmann
• Re: A note on process
  • From: Felix Winkelmann
• Re: A note on process
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Re: A note on process
  • From: Felix Winkelmann
• Re: A note on process
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Re: A note on process
  • From: Felix Winkelmann
• Re: Pika-style from first principles
  • From: Marc Feeley
• Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)"
  • From: Tom Lord
• scheme_lookup_imported_binding
  • From: David Van Horn
• Re: no constants please
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)"
  • From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)"
  • From: bear
• Re: no constants please
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Re: Pika-style from first principles
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Re: Couple things...
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Re: A note on process
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: no constants please
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: Pika-style from first principles
  • From: Marc Feeley
• Re: Pika-style from first principles
  • From: Michael Sperber
• when GC is permitted
  • From: Jim Blandy
• Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)"
  • From: Jim Blandy
• Re: when GC is permitted
  • From: Richard Kelsey
• Re: when GC is permitted
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: when GC is permitted
  • From: Jim Blandy
• Re: when GC is permitted
  • From: Jim Blandy
• Re: when GC is permitted
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: when GC is permitted
  • From: Felix Winkelmann
• Re: Strings/chars
  • From: Jim Blandy
• Re: Couple things...
  • From: Jim Blandy
• Re: when GC is permitted
  • From: Jim Blandy
• Re: when GC is permitted
  • From: Felix Winkelmann
• Re: Strings/chars
  • From: Shiro Kawai
• Re: Couple things...
  • From: bear
• Re: when GC is permitted
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: when GC is permitted
  • From: Jim Blandy
• Re: when GC is permitted
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: when GC is permitted
  • From: Jim Blandy
• Re: Strings/chars
  • From: Jim Blandy
• Re: Couple things...
  • From: Jim Blandy
• Re: when GC is permitted
  • From: Richard Kelsey
• Re: when GC is permitted
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: Couple things...
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: Pika-style from first principles
  • From: Marc Feeley
• Re: when GC is permitted
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: Strings/chars
  • From: Shiro Kawai
• Re: Couple things...
  • From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• Re: Strings/chars
  • From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• Re: when GC is permitted
  • From: Jim Blandy
• Re: when GC is permitted
  • From: Jim Blandy
• Re: Strings/chars
  • From: Jim Blandy
• Re: Strings/chars
  • From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• Re: when GC is permitted
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: Couple things...
  • From: bear
• Re: when GC is permitted
  • From: Felix Winkelmann
• Re: when GC is permitted
  • From: Richard Kelsey
• Re: Couple things...
  • From: Bradd W. Szonye
• Oh.
  • From: Jim Blandy
• Re: Couple things...
  • From: bear
• Re: Pika-style from first principles
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Re: Pika-style from first principles
  • From: Marc Feeley
• Re: Pika-style from first principles
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Re: when GC is permitted
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: when GC is permitted
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Re: Pika-style from first principles
  • From: Marc Feeley
• Re: when GC is permitted
  • From: Richard Kelsey
• Re: when GC is permitted
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: when GC is permitted
  • From: Marc Feeley
• Re: when GC is permitted
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: when GC is permitted
  • From: Matthew Dempsky
• Re: when GC is permitted
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Re: when GC is permitted
  • From: Matthew Dempsky
• Re: when GC is permitted
  • From: Matthew Dempsky
• Re: when GC is permitted
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Re: when GC is permitted
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: when GC is permitted
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: when GC is permitted
  • From: Matthew Dempsky
• Re: when GC is permitted
  • From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• Re: when GC is permitted
  • From: Richard Kelsey
• Re: when GC is permitted
  • From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• Re: when GC is permitted
  • From: Marc Feeley
• Re: when GC is permitted
  • From: felix
• Re: Pika-style from first principles
  • From: felix
• Re: when GC is permitted
  • From: felix
• Re: when GC is permitted
  • From: felix
• Re: when GC is permitted
  • From: Matthew Dempsky
• temporarily withdrawing SRFI-50
  • From: Jim Blandy
• Re: when GC is permitted
  • From: Jim Blandy
• Re: when GC is permitted
  • From: felix
• Re: when GC is permitted
  • From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• Re: temporarily withdrawing SRFI-50
  • From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• Re: temporarily withdrawing SRFI-50
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: when GC is permitted
  • From: Richard Kelsey
• Re: when GC is permitted
  • From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• Re: when GC is permitted
  • From: bear
• Re: Pika-style from first principles
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Re: Pika-style from first principles
  • From: Felix Winkelmann
• Re: temporarily withdrawing SRFI-50
  • From: Jim Blandy
• Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style
  • From: Jim Blandy
• Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style
  • From: Per Bothner
• Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style
  • From: Jim Blandy
• Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style
  • From: Jim Blandy
• Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style
  • From: Jim Blandy
• Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style
  • From: Jim Blandy
• Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: temporarily withdrawing SRFI-50
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Re: when GC is permitted
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style
  • From: Jim Blandy
• Re: when GC is permitted
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style
  • From: Jim Blandy
• Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style
  • From: Per Bothner
• Re: when GC is permitted
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style
  • From: Jim Blandy
• Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style
  • From: bear
• Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style
  • From: Per Bothner
• Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style
  • From: Shiro Kawai
• Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style
  • From: bear
• Re: when GC is permitted
  • From: Benderjg
• Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style
  • From: Per Bothner
• Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style
  • From: Shiro Kawai
• Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style
  • From: Shiro Kawai
• Re: when GC is permitted
  • From: Marc Feeley
• Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: when GC is permitted
  • From: Richard Kelsey
• kind request for a sync()
  • From: sebastian . egner
• Re: when GC is permitted
  • From: Eric Knauel
• Re: when GC is permitted
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: when GC is permitted
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: Couple things...
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Re: Couple things...
  • From: bear
• Re: Couple things...
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Re: Couple things...
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: Couple things...
  • From: bear
• Re: Couple things...
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: Couple things...
  • From: bear
• Re: Couple things...
  • From: Tom Lord
• strings draft
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: strings draft
  • From: Shiro Kawai
• Re: strings draft
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: strings draft
  • From: bear
• Re: strings draft
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: strings draft
  • From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• Re: strings draft
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: strings draft
  • From: Alex Shinn
• Re: strings draft
  • From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• Re: strings draft
  • From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• Re: strings draft
  • From: Paul Schlie
• Re: strings draft
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: strings draft
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: strings draft
  • From: Alex Shinn
• Re: strings draft
  • From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• Re: strings draft
  • From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• Re: strings draft
  • From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• Re: strings draft
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: strings draft
  • From: Alex Shinn
• Re: strings draft
  • From: Alex Shinn
• Re: strings draft
  • From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• Re: strings draft
  • From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• Re: strings draft
  • From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• Re: strings draft
  • From: Shiro Kawai
• READ-OCTET (Re: strings draft)
  • From: Shiro Kawai
• Re: strings draft
  • From: bear
• Re: strings draft
  • From: bear
• Re: strings draft
  • From: Paul Schlie
• Re: strings draft (musings)
  • From: Paul Schlie
• Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft]
  • From: Ken Dickey
• Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft]
  • From: bear
• Re: strings draft
  • From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft]
  • From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• Re: strings draft
  • From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft]
  • From: Per Bothner
• Re: strings draft
  • From: Bradd W. Szonye
• Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft]
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft]
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft]
  • From: Per Bothner
• Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft]
  • From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• Re: strings draft
  • From: Paul Schlie
• Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft]
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft]
  • From: Ken Dickey
• Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft]
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft]
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: strings draft
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: strings draft
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: strings draft
  • From: bear
• Re: strings draft
  • From: Matthew Dempsky
• Re: strings draft
  • From: Shiro Kawai
• Re: strings draft
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: strings draft
  • From: Shiro Kawai
• Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft]
  • From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft]
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: strings draft
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft]
  • From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• Re: strings draft (premature, need first class type definition support first?)
  • From: Paul Schlie
• Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft]
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: strings draft (premature, need first class type definition support first?)
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: strings draft
  • From: Shiro Kawai
• Re: strings draft (premature, need first class type definition support first?)
  • From: Paul Schlie
• Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft]
  • From: Ken Dickey
• Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft]
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: strings draft
  • From: Matthew Dempsky
• Re: strings draft
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: strings draft
  • From: Alex Shinn
• Re: strings draft
  • From: Alex Shinn
• Re: strings draft
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: strings draft
  • From: bear
• Re: strings draft
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: strings draft
  • From: Alex Shinn
• Re: strings draft
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: strings draft
  • From: Shiro Kawai
• Re: strings draft
  • From: Alex Shinn
• Octet vs Char (Re: strings draft)
  • From: Shiro Kawai
• Re: Octet vs Char (Re: strings draft)
  • From: bear
• Re: Octet vs Char (Re: strings draft)
  • From: Matthew Dempsky
• Re: Octet vs Char (Re: strings draft)
  • From: Matthew Dempsky
• Re: Octet vs Char
  • From: Shiro Kawai
• Re: strings draft
  • From: Matthew Dempsky
• proposed srfi for extended character sets
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: strings draft
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: Octet vs Char (Re: strings draft)
  • From: Paul Schlie
• Re: Octet vs Char (Re: strings draft)
  • From: Ken Dickey
• Re: Octet vs Char
  • From: Shiro Kawai
• Re: Octet vs Char
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: Octet vs Char (Re: strings draft)
  • From: bear
• Re: Octet vs Char
  • From: bear
• Re: Octet vs Char (Re: strings draft)
  • From: Ken Dickey
• Re: Octet vs Char (Re: strings draft)
  • From: bear
• Strings, one last detail.
  • From: bear
• Clarification of SCHEME_GC_PROTECT/SCHEME_GC_UNPROTECT
  • From: bear
• Re: Strings, one last detail.
  • From: Shiro Kawai
• Re: Strings, one last detail.
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: Strings, one last detail.
  • From: bear
• Re: Strings, one last detail.
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: Strings, one last detail.
  • From: bear
• Re: Strings, one last detail.
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: Strings, one last detail.
  • From: bear
• Re: strings draft
  • From: Bradd W. Szonye
• Re: strings draft
  • From: Bradd W. Szonye
• Unicode and Scheme
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: Unicode and Scheme
  • From: Paul Schlie
• Re: Unicode and Scheme (tweaked)
  • From: Paul Schlie
• Re: Unicode and Scheme (tweaked)
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: strings draft
  • From: Alex Shinn
• Re: Unicode and Scheme (tweaked)
  • From: Paul Schlie
• specifying source encoding (Re: strings draft)
  • From: Shiro Kawai
• Re: strings draft
  • From: Bradd W. Szonye
• Permitting and Supporting Extended Character Sets: response.
  • From: bear
• Re: Unicode and Scheme
  • From: bear
• Re: Permitting and Supporting Extended Character Sets: response.
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: Unicode and Scheme
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: Permitting and Supporting Extended Character Sets: response.
  • From: bear
• Re: Unicode and Scheme
  • From: bear
• Re: Permitting and Supporting Extended Character Sets: response.
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: Permitting and Supporting Extended Character Sets: response.
  • From: bear
• Re: Permitting and Supporting Extended Character Sets: response.
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: Encodings.
  • From: Paul Schlie
• More JNI vs. Pika comparison
  • From: Jim Blandy
• Re: More JNI vs. Pika comparison
  • From: Matthew Dempsky
• Re: More JNI vs. Pika comparison
  • From: Jim Blandy
• Re: More JNI vs. Pika comparison
  • From: Matthew Dempsky
• Re: More JNI vs. Pika comparison
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: More JNI vs. Pika comparison
  • From: Jim Blandy
• Re: More JNI vs. Pika comparison
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: More JNI vs. Pika comparison
  • From: Jim Blandy
• Re: More JNI vs. Pika comparison
  • From: Tom Lord
• Re: Clarification of SCHEME_GC_PROTECT/SCHEME_GC_UNPROTECT
  • From: Michael Sperber