[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> writes:
Tom> Wow. Just generally, the char-type/string-type issues stand
Tom> a good chance of hosing this srfi, at least for implementors that care
Tom> about unicode. That blows.
We suspected as much. That doesn't mean we can't resolve a lot of the
other issues, and it also doesn't mean the resulting SRFI won't be
useful. I fully expect us to have to write up a successor to this
SRFI once the character issues are resolved (better).
Moreover, this discussion is already generating a lot of tremendously
None of that blows.
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla