[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Strings, one last detail.
> From: bear <bear@xxxxxxxxx>
> >The lock/unlock pattern can solve it -- not in the general case but in
> >a useful way -- and is quite portable.
> This is true -- but impossible within the context of the current draft of
> the SRFI because there is no call to hang the unlock() method on.
I don't understand. The unlock() should be an explicit part of the
FFI (when/if r/w-sharing-semantics string extraction is added).