This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 50 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 50 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.
tb@xxxxxxxxxx (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes: > Jim Blandy <jimb@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > As long as SRFI's of both sorts become available within the next year, > > the right thing will happen. I don't think it's necessary for SRFI-50 > > to be withdrawn until a more opaque SRFI is written. > > What confidence do we have that the more opaque SRFI will be written? > (Are there people working on drafts now?) Well, if SRFI-50 turned out not to be what I was hoping, and I didn't come to my senses quickly enough, I was going to turn <minor/minor.h>, into a .texi file, start a SRFI from that, and see what people said.