[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: when GC is permitted
Richard Kelsey wrote:
> (C) Withdraw SRFI-50 from consideration until after there
> is separate SRFI describing a more general and more
> portable FFI
> So what I want to know, in an attempt to locate some consensus,
> is whether the folks that have been objecting to SRFI-50 in
> its current form would be happy (or at least significantly less
> unhappy) with (C).
"C" would certainly be my preference.