This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 50 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 50 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.
Richard Kelsey wrote: > (C) Withdraw SRFI-50 from consideration until after there > is separate SRFI describing a more general and more > portable FFI > ... > > So what I want to know, in an attempt to locate some consensus, > is whether the folks that have been objecting to SRFI-50 in > its current form would be happy (or at least significantly less > unhappy) with (C). "C" would certainly be my preference. Marc