[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: no constants please
Richard Kelsey <kelsey@xxxxxxx> writes:
> The proposed SRFI works fine with threads, as long as those
> threads do not require interrupting the C code at arbitrary
That's not threads. See jimb's post from a while back.
Look, the problem here is easy:
1) Your SRFI demonstrably loses on certain kinds of implementations;
2) There is a minor change which will make it not lose.
Why on earth not prefer number (2)????