[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: handling multiple scheme instances

To: Tom Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: handling multiple scheme instances
From: Michael Sperber <sperber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2003 17:12:45 +0100
Cc: srfi-50@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: srfi-50@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200312232329.PAA19098@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Tom Lord's message of "Tue, 23 Dec 2003 15:29:16 -0800 (PST)")
References: <200312232329.PAA19098@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Gnus/5.090019 (Oort Gnus v0.19) XEmacs/21.5 (celeriac, berkeley-unix)

>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> writes:

Tom> Every function should take an extra parameter which represents the
Tom> particular Scheme instance under consideration.   I might be running
Tom> two different Scheme worlds in one process.

Can't you handle this implicitly?  Or do you need to switch between
instances along a single call chain?

-- 
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla

Follow-Ups:
- Re: handling multiple scheme instances
  - From: Tom Lord

References:
- handling multiple scheme instances
  - From: Tom Lord

Prev by Date: Re: GC safety and return values
Next by Date: Re: non-local exits are icky
Previous by thread: Re: handling multiple scheme instances
Next by thread: Re: handling multiple scheme instances
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread