This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 50 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 50 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.
Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 07:42:48 +0100 From: Felix Winkelmann <felix@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Now, I'm all for maximum performance, if possible. But that's not (IMHO) the proper goal for this SRFI. I am curious as to what you mean by 'this SRFI'. Do you think that maximum performace is not a proper goal for any FFI SRFI? Or only for the first one? Would you be less displeased by SRFI-50 if it appeared after a JNI-style SRFI was in place? I can understand wanting the first FFI SRFI being a safer, more general one, perhaps based on JNI or Pika. This SRFI isn't that SRFI because that isn't the type of FFI that Mike and I needed. -Richard Kelsey