[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: temporarily withdrawing SRFI-50

Jim Blandy <jimb@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> As long as SRFI's of both sorts become available within the next year,
> the right thing will happen.  I don't think it's necessary for SRFI-50
> to be withdrawn until a more opaque SRFI is written.

What confidence do we have that the more opaque SRFI will be written?
(Are there people working on drafts now?)