[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: character strings versus byte strings

This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 50 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 50 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.

To: Matthew Flatt <mflatt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: character strings versus byte strings
From: Michael Sperber <sperber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 10:36:41 +0100
Cc: srfi-50@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: srfi-50@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20031222141633.829B7828@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Matthew Flatt's message of "Mon, 22 Dec 2003 07:16:25 -0700")
References: <20031222141633.829B7828@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Gnus/5.090019 (Oort Gnus v0.19) XEmacs/21.5 (celeriac, berkeley-unix)

>>>>> "Matthew" == Matthew Flatt <mflatt@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

Matthew>  * Change the API to distinguish between byte strings and character
Matthew>    strings. (I think C code is as likely to need one as the other).

Would you suggest simply supporting SRFI 4 byte strings?

-- 
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla

References:
- character strings versus byte strings
  - From: Matthew Flatt

Prev by Date: Re: thread-safe interfaces
Next by Date: Re: character strings versus byte strings
Previous by thread: Re: character strings versus byte strings
Next by thread: Couple things...
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread