At 22 Jan 2004 19:13:23 -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > > Oh, I misunderstood your proposal here. I'm happy to have a default > argument the way the current I/O functions work, though I do prefer an > explict argument. Sorry, I was overly brief, I considered this implied by the "and" when I wrote "and/or": And/or use an implicit (current-locale) as in my response on c.l.s. -- Alex