On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 16:14:57 -0500, Richard Kelsey <kelsey@xxxxxxx> wrote:
(C) Withdraw SRFI-50 from consideration until after there is separate SRFI describing a more general and more portable FFI (D) Withdraw SRFI-50 permanently
[...]
So what I want to know, in an attempt to locate some consensus, is whether the folks that have been objecting to SRFI-50 in its current form would be happy (or at least significantly less unhappy) with (C).
yup. cheers, felix