[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: no constants please
On Sun, 04 Jan 2004 13:09:44 -0500, Richard Kelsey <kelsey@xxxxxxx> wrote:
The JNI style of FFI, where the C code has indirect references and
never the Scheme values themselves, has lots of advantages. But it
does add overhead. I would prefer an FFI that allowed a choice of
direct or indirect values on a per-function basis.
I think the overhead is largely unimportant. Unless you are interacting
with near-c-speed-sufficiently-smart-scheme-compilers (better think of
crawling-lame-naive-bytecode-interpreter) the overhead of this will
be completely lost in the noise the Scheme implementation produces.
(And so far I haven't seen anybody complain about JNIs performance,
so the performance issue looks a little bit artifical to me)
I think safety and portability is much more important, and I wonder
why the authors of this SRFI are giving it so little thought.