[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: thread-safe interfaces

To: Jim Blandy <jimb@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: thread-safe interfaces
From: Michael Sperber <sperber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 10:34:54 +0100
Cc: srfi-50@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: srfi-50@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <vt28yl5e21q.fsf@xxxxxxxxxx> (Jim Blandy's message of "22 Dec 2003 02:37:05 -0500")
References: <vt28yl5e21q.fsf@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Gnus/5.090019 (Oort Gnus v0.19) XEmacs/21.5 (celeriac, berkeley-unix)

>>>>> "Jim" == Jim Blandy <jimb@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

Jim> If I'm reading the proposal right, the interface does not support this
Jim> notion of "threads".

Jim> If doing so simply isn't interesting to the SRFI-50 authors, I can
Jim> understand that; [...]

Before I actually state opinions or conclusions on this issue (which
will probably have to wait until 2004), let me say that this certainly
is interesting (at least to me); it was just beyond (at least my)
experience and ability to try to design something that fits with OS
multithreading.

So any discussion on this is welcome!

-- 
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla

References:
- thread-safe interfaces
  - From: Jim Blandy

Prev by Date: Re: Strings/chars
Next by Date: Re: character strings versus byte strings
Previous by thread: thread-safe interfaces
Next by thread: Re: thread-safe interfaces [correction]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread