[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: no constants please
> From: Richard Kelsey <kelsey@xxxxxxx>
> Within the context of this SRFI I don't care about asynchronous
> execution (I do care about threads, but as long as C code is not
> interrupted asychronously they don't matter). The GC protection
> mechanism described in the SRFI is inadequate if GCs can occur
> asynchronously. Even if variables 'a' and 'b' are protected,
> there is no guarentee that a = b; will not temporarily store the
> value of 'b' in some unprotected location such as a register.
Ok, I don't care about this srfi anymore.
You've been presented simple solutions that eliminate those
limitations. I don't think you have any good reason to blow them off