[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Couple things...
>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> writes:
Tom> One approach to this, that taken by the draft, is to make an FFI that
Tom> models a substantial part of the semantics of the high-level language
Tom> -- then let the FFI-using programmer fill in the gap between that and
Tom> our target libraries.
Tom> Another approach, that proposed by Felix (if I'm reading right), is to
Tom> make an FFI that captures the semantics of the libraries in a
Tom> first-class way -- then let the FFI-_implementing_ programmer fill in
Tom> the gap between that and his high-level language implementation.
That's also how I'd state it. To my mind, this means the two
approaches are complementary rather than exclusive. But Felix seems
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla