[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: character strings versus byte strings
From: Tom Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: character strings versus byte strings
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 14:59:57 -0800 (PST)
> ultimately Scheme's CHAR? and STRING? types are doomed and that we're
> going to have to leave them underspecified and eventually unimportant
> (in favor of a new TEXT? type).
Eventually, I agree.
> Here here, cheers, and happy holidays. Now, to what extent to we want
> the SRFI-50 process to become that battleground vs. to what extent do
> we want it to step lightly around the issue :-)
I don't think we can settle down Scheme character problem here.
From the common FFI perspective, however, there's a fact that we
already have bunch of external C libraries that expects utf-8 string,
and we want to call them. So I think its reasonable to have
scheme-string-with-opaque-internal-rep <=> Utf8CString specified.
Also from the FFI perspective, a scheme character may not be important
after all. We could have FFI that deals only with utf-8 strings,
and keep Scheme character issues inside Scheme world.