[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: temporarily withdrawing SRFI-50

To: tb@xxxxxxxxxx (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)
Subject: Re: temporarily withdrawing SRFI-50
From: Michael Sperber <sperber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 22:14:51 +0100
Cc: Jim Blandy <jimb@xxxxxxxxxx>, srfi-50@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: srfi-50@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <877jzwtzaz.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Thomas Bushnell's message of "12 Jan 2004 17:25:24 -0800")
References: <E1AfQRd-0000Qa-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <vt2y8scua4h.fsf@xxxxxxxxxx> <877jzwtzaz.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Gnus/5.110001 (No Gnus v0.1) XEmacs/21.5 (celeriac, berkeley-unix)

>>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Bushnell <tb@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

Thomas> Jim Blandy <jimb@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

>> As long as SRFI's of both sorts become available within the next year,
>> the right thing will happen.  I don't think it's necessary for SRFI-50
>> to be withdrawn until a more opaque SRFI is written.

Thomas> What confidence do we have that the more opaque SRFI will be written?

100%

Guess why.

-- 
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla

References:
- Re: when GC is permitted
  - From: Richard Kelsey
- temporarily withdrawing SRFI-50
  - From: Jim Blandy
- Re: temporarily withdrawing SRFI-50
  - From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG

Prev by Date: Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style
Next by Date: Re: when GC is permitted
Previous by thread: Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style
Next by thread: Re: when GC is permitted
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread