[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: temporarily withdrawing SRFI-50

>>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Bushnell <tb@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

Thomas> Jim Blandy <jimb@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

>> As long as SRFI's of both sorts become available within the next year,
>> the right thing will happen.  I don't think it's necessary for SRFI-50
>> to be withdrawn until a more opaque SRFI is written.

Thomas> What confidence do we have that the more opaque SRFI will be written?


Guess why.

Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla