[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: strings draft
Tom Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> writes:
> > This is inconsistent with best Unicode practice, thanks to the
> > "Turkish I Problem".
> Actually, I _think_ it works out fine. Please see the corresponding
> threads on comp.lang.scheme.
My understanding is that the c.l.s idea is simply to use the generic
Unicode case mapping functions.
I do not object to a Scheme that chooses to do this. But your draft
seems to exclude a Scheme that does *best* Unicode practice, which is
not to shove any details under the rug.
If I have misunderstood, can you please point to something more
specific for me to read (or reproduce the relevant arguments here)?