Mail Index

• Thread Index

• naming convention
  • From: Andre van Tonder
• meta-comment on typing
  • From: Per Bothner
• minor comments
  • From: Per Bothner
• Small omission
  • From: Andre van Tonder
• Mixing safe and unsafe code
  • From: Paul Steckler
• Re: meta-comment on typing
  • From: John.Cowan
• Re: meta-comment on typing
  • From: Per Bothner
• bitwise operations
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer
• Re: meta-comment on typing
  • From: John.Cowan
• Re: meta-comment on typing
  • From: Per Bothner
• Re: meta-comment on typing
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Re: meta-comment on typing
  • From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
• Re: meta-comment on typing
  • From: Per Bothner
• Re: meta-comment on typing
  • From: Per Bothner
• [SRFI 77] integer-length and integer-sqrt
  • From: Jens Axel Søgaard
• Re: meta-comment on typing
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Re: meta-comment on typing
  • From: John.Cowan
• Re: integer-length and integer-sqrt
  • From: Bradley Lucier
• Integers as Bits [was Re: integer-length]
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer
• Re: meta-comment on typing
  • From: Per Bothner
• safe/unsafe mode
  • From: Sebastian Egner
• implementation categories, exact rationals
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer
• Re: implementation categories, exact rationals
  • From: John.Cowan
• Re: implementation categories, exact rationals
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer
• Re: implementation categories, exact rationals
  • From: John.Cowan
• Re: implementation categories, exact rationals
  • From: bear
• Re: meta-comment on typing
  • From: bear
• Re: meta-comment on typing
  • From: bear
• Re: meta-comment on typing
  • From: Per Bothner
• Re: meta-comment on typing
  • From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
• Re: integer-length and integer-sqrt
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer
• Re: implementation categories, exact rationals
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Re: implementation categories, exact rationals
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer
• Re: integer-length and integer-sqrt
  • From: Bradley Lucier
• Re: implementation categories, exact rationals
  • From: Bradley Lucier
• Arithmetic issues
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Re: Arithmetic issues
  • From: felix winkelmann
• Re: Arithmetic issues - feedback
  • From: Andre van Tonder
• Re: Arithmetic issues
  • From: John.Cowan
• Re: Arithmetic issues - feedback
  • From: John.Cowan
• Re: Arithmetic issues - feedback
  • From: Andre van Tonder
• Re: meta-comment on typing
  • From: bear
• Re: Arithmetic issues
  • From: bear
• Some preliminary comments
  • From: Bradley Lucier
• Re: meta-comment on typing
  • From: Alan Watson
• Re: Arithmetic issues
  • From: John.Cowan
• Re: Arithmetic issues
  • From: bear
• Re: Arithmetic issues
  • From: John.Cowan
• Re: Arithmetic issues
  • From: bear
• Re: Arithmetic issues
  • From: Andre van Tonder
• Re: Arithmetic issues
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer
• FIXNUM (aka Re: Arithmetic issues)
  • From: Sebastian Egner
• Re: Arithmetic issues
  • From: Andre van Tonder
• Re: Arithmetic issues
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer
• Re: Arithmetic issues
  • From: John.Cowan
• My comments
  • From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
• Re: My comments
  • From: Bradd W. Szonye
• Re: My comments
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: My comments
  • From: Bradd W. Szonye
• Re: My comments
  • From: John.Cowan
• Re: My comments
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: My comments
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: My comments
  • From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
• Re: My comments
  • From: Bradd W. Szonye
• Re: My comments
  • From: Bradd W. Szonye
• Re: My comments
  • From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
• Re: My comments
  • From: Bradd W. Szonye
• Re: My comments
  • From: Bradd W. Szonye
• Exactness (was Re: My comments)
  • From: bear
• Re: Exactness
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: Exactness
  • From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
• Re: Exactness
  • From: Bradd W. Szonye
• Re: Exactness
  • From: bear
• Re: Exactness
  • From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
• Re: Exactness
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: Exactness
  • From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
• arithmetic issues
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: John.Cowan
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: bear
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
• Re: Exactness
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: Exactness
  • From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Taylor Campbell
• Re: Exactness
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: Exactness
  • From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
• Re: Exactness
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: Exactness
  • From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
• Re: Exactness
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: Exactness
  • From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
• Re: Exactness
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Alan Watson
• Re: Exactness
  • From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
• Re: Exactness
  • From: Per Bothner
• Re: Exactness
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: John.Cowan
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: John.Cowan
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: bear
• Re: Exactness
  • From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
• +nan.0 problems
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer
• +nan.0 contradiction
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: Exactness
  • From: bear
• Re: Exactness
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• multiplicative inverse of 0.0
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer
• Re: Exactness
  • From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
• Re: multiplicative inverse of 0.0
  • From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
• multiplicative inverse of 0.0
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer
• Re: +nan.0 problems
  • From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
• Re: Exactness
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: +nan.0 problems
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: Exactness
  • From: Bradd W. Szonye
• Re: +nan.0 contradiction
  • From: Bakul Shah
• Re: multiplicative inverse of 0.0
  • From: Bakul Shah
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer
• Re: +nan.0 problems
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: +nan.0 problems
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Alan Watson
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer
• Testing the reference implementation
  • From: Bradley Lucier
• Re: +nan.0 problems
  • From: John.Cowan
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: John.Cowan
• Re: Exactness
  • From: John.Cowan
• Re: multiplicative inverse of 0.0
  • From: John.Cowan
• Re: +nan.0 problems
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer
• Re: multiplicative inverse of 0.0
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer
• Is exact 0 "stronger" than inexact 0.0?
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer
• Re: Is exact 0 "stronger" than inexact 0.0?
  • From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: Exactness
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: +nan.0 problems
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Bradley Lucier
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Jens Axel Søgaard
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Taylor Campbell
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Paul Schlie
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Alan Watson
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Taylor Campbell
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Taylor Campbell
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Taylor Campbell
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Alan Watson
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Alan Watson
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: John.Cowan
• Re: +nan.0 problems
  • From: bear
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: bear
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Taylor Campbell
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Per Bothner
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Alan Watson
• Re: Testing the reference implementation
  • From: Sebastian Egner
• reading NaNs
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: bear
• Re: reading NaNs
  • From: Per Bothner
• Re: reading NaNs
  • From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
• Re: reading NaNs
  • From: bear
• Re: reading NaNs
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer
• Re: reading NaNs
  • From: Alan Watson
• Re: reading NaNs
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer
• Re: reading NaNs
  • From: Alan Watson
• Re: reading NaNs
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer
• Re: reading NaNs
  • From: Alan Watson
• Re: reading NaNs
  • From: Per Bothner
• Re: reading NaNs
  • From: Alan Watson
• Re: reading NaNs
  • From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
• Re: reading NaNs
  • From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Taylor Campbell
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Alan Watson
• Common Lisp solved this problem 20 years ago
  • From: Alan Watson
• Re: Common Lisp solved this problem 20 years ago
  • From: bear
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Per Bothner
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Per Bothner
• Re: Common Lisp solved this problem 20 years ago
  • From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
• Re: Common Lisp solved this problem 20 years ago
  • From: Per Bothner
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Alan Watson
• Re: Common Lisp solved this problem 20 years ago
  • From: Alan Watson
• Re: Common Lisp solved this problem 20 years ago
  • From: Alan Watson
• Re: Common Lisp solved this problem 20 years ago
  • From: Alan Watson
• Re: Common Lisp solved this problem 20 years ago
  • From: Alan Watson
• Re: Common Lisp solved this problem 20 years ago
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer
• Re: Common Lisp solved this problem 20 years ago
  • From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
• Re: Common Lisp solved this problem 20 years ago
  • From: Alan Watson
• Re: reading NaNs
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer
• Re: reading NaNs
  • From: Shiro Kawai
• Re: reading NaNs
  • From: Alan Watson
• Re: reading NaNs
  • From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
• Re: Common Lisp solved this problem 20 years ago
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer
• Re: Common Lisp solved this problem 20 years ago
  • From: Alan Watson
• Re: reading NaNs
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer
• Re: Common Lisp solved this problem 20 years ago
  • From: Per Bothner
• Re: Common Lisp solved this problem 20 years ago
  • From: Alan Watson
• Re: Common Lisp solved this problem 20 years ago
  • From: Per Bothner
• Re: Common Lisp solved this problem 20 years ago
  • From: Alan Watson
• Re: Common Lisp solved this problem 20 years ago
  • From: Per Bothner
• Re: Common Lisp solved this problem 20 years ago
  • From: Alan Watson
• Re: Common Lisp solved this problem 20 years ago
  • From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
• Re: reading NaNs
  • From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
• Re: reading NaNs
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: Common Lisp solved this problem 20 years ago
  • From: Taylor Campbell
• Re: reading NaNs
  • From: John.Cowan
• Re: Common Lisp solved this problem 20 years ago
  • From: John.Cowan
• Re: Common Lisp solved this problem 20 years ago
  • From: Per Bothner
• Re: reading NaNs
  • From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
• Re: reading NaNs
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: reading NaNs
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: Common Lisp solved this problem 20 years ago
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: Common Lisp solved this problem 20 years ago
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: reading NaNs
  • From: Bradd W. Szonye
• Re: reading NaNs
  • From: John.Cowan
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: John Cowan
• Re: Common Lisp solved this problem 20 years ago
  • From: Per Bothner
• Re: Common Lisp solved this problem 20 years ago
  • From: John.Cowan
• Re: reading NaNs
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: Common Lisp solved this problem 20 years ago
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: Common Lisp solved this problem 20 years ago
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: reading NaNs
  • From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
• Re: Common Lisp solved this problem 20 years ago
  • From: Alan Watson
• Re: reading NaNs
  • From: Taylor Campbell
• Re: reading NaNs
  • From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
• Re: Common Lisp solved this problem 20 years ago
  • From: Taylor Campbell
• Re: reading NaNs
  • From: Per Bothner
• Re: reading NaNs
  • From: Alan Watson
• Re: reading NaNs
  • From: Alan Watson
• Re: Common Lisp solved this problem 20 years ago
  • From: Per Bothner
• Re: reading NaNs
  • From: Taylor Campbell
• Re: Common Lisp solved this problem 20 years ago
  • From: Per Bothner
• Re: reading NaNs
  • From: Alan Watson
• Re: Common Lisp solved this problem 20 years ago
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: Common Lisp solved this problem 20 years ago
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: reading NaNs
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: Common Lisp solved this problem 20 years ago
  • From: Per Bothner
• Re: reading NaNs
  • From: bear
• Re: Common Lisp solved this problem 20 years ago
  • From: Per Bothner
• Re: Common Lisp solved this problem 20 years ago
  • From: bear
• Re: reading NaNs
  • From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
• Re: reading NaNs
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer
• Re: reading NaNs
  • From: bear
• Re: reading NaNs
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: reading NaNs
  • From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
• Re: reading NaNs
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: reading NaNs
  • From: Jens Axel Søgaard
• Re: reading NaNs
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: reading NaNs
  • From: Alan Watson
• Re: reading NaNs
  • From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
• Re: reading NaNs
  • From: Alan Watson
• Re: reading NaNs
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: reading NaNs
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: reading NaNs
  • From: Bradley Lucier
• Re: reading NaNs
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer
• Re: Arithmetic issues
  • From: Per Bothner
• Re: Arithmetic issues
  • From: Alan Watson
• Re: Arithmetic issues
  • From: Bradley Lucier
• Re: Arithmetic issues
  • From: Alan Watson
• NaN's
  • From: Paul Schlie
• Re: NaN's
  • From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
• Re: NaN's
  • From: Paul Schlie
• Re: reading NaNs
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer
• Re: NaN's
  • From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
• Error objects in general
  • From: bear
• Re: Error objects in general
  • From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
• Re: reading NaNs
  • From: Alan Watson
• Re: Error objects in general
  • From: Alan Watson
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer
• Re: NaN's
  • From: Paul Schlie
• Re: reading NaNs
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer
• Re: reading NaNs
  • From: Alan Watson
• Re: Error objects in general
  • From: bear
• Re: Error objects in general
  • From: Taylor Campbell
• Re: Error objects in general
  • From: Alan Watson
• Re: Error objects in general
  • From: bear
• Re: reading NaNs
  • From: Alan Watson
• Re: reading NaNs
  • From: Taylor Campbell
• Re: Error objects in general
  • From: bear
• Re: Error objects in general
  • From: bear
• Re: Error objects in general
  • From: Alan Watson
• Re: Error objects in general
  • From: Paul Schlie
• Re: Error objects in general
  • From: Paul Schlie
• Re: Error objects in general
  • From: Alan Watson
• Re: Error objects in general
  • From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
• Re: Error objects in general
  • From: John.Cowan
• Re: Error objects in general
  • From: Taylor Campbell
• Re: Error objects in general
  • From: Alan Watson
• Re: Testing the reference implementation
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Re: Testing the reference implementation
  • From: Bradley Lucier
• (- 1.0 1.0) => 0 ; not +0.0 ?
  • From: Paul Schlie
• Unifying the two generic arithmetic alternatives
  • From: Andrew Wilcox
• Re: Unifying the two generic arithmetic alternatives
  • From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
• Re: Unifying the two generic arithmetic alternatives
  • From: Andrew Wilcox
• Re: Unifying the two generic arithmetic alternatives
  • From: John.Cowan
• Re: Unifying the two generic arithmetic alternatives
  • From: John.Cowan
• Re: Unifying the two generic arithmetic alternatives
  • From: bear
• Re: Unifying the two generic arithmetic alternatives
  • From: Andrew Wilcox
• Re: Unifying the two generic arithmetic alternatives
  • From: Dave Mason
• Re: Unifying the two generic arithmetic alternatives
  • From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
• Contagious Inexactness, revision 2
  • From: Andrew Wilcox
• Re: Contagious Inexactness, revision 2
  • From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
• Re: Contagious Inexactness, revision 2
  • From: Andrew Wilcox
• Generic Exact Arithmetic
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: bear
• Re: Testing the reference implementation
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Contagious Inexactness: dealing with conditionals
  • From: Andrew Wilcox
• Re: Testing the reference implementation
  • From: Bradley Lucier
• Re: Testing the reference implementation
  • From: Bradley Lucier
• Re: Testing the reference implementation
  • From: Bradley Lucier
• Re: Testing the reference implementation
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Re: Testing the reference implementation
  • From: Bradley Lucier
• Re: Testing the reference implementation
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Re: safe/unsafe mode
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Re: safe/unsafe mode
  • From: bear
• Re: safe/unsafe mode
  • From: Sebastian Egner
• Re: safe/unsafe mode
  • From: bear
• Re: safe/unsafe mode
  • From: Paul Schlie
• Re: safe/unsafe mode
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Draft extension
  • From: David Van Horn
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: William D Clinger
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Alan Watson
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: bear
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: William D Clinger
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Alan Watson
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Alan Watson
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: William D Clinger
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: William D Clinger
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Alan Watson
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Alan Watson
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: William D Clinger
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Alan Watson
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Paul Schlie
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: William D Clinger
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: William D Clinger
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Alan Watson
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Alan Watson
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: bear
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: bear
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: William D Clinger
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: William D Clinger
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: William D Clinger
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: bear
• Re: straw-man [was Re: arithmetic issues]
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer
• Re: straw-man [was Re: arithmetic issues]
  • From: Alan Watson
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Alan Watson
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Alan Watson
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: William D Clinger
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Paul Schlie
• Re: straw-man [was Re: arithmetic issues]
  • From: William D Clinger
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: William D Clinger
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: William D Clinger
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Paul Schlie
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Paul Schlie
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Paul Schlie
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Re: arithmetic issues
  • From: Paul Schlie
• Re: straw-man [was Re: arithmetic issues]
  • From: Bradley Lucier
• Re: straw-man [was Re: arithmetic issues]
  • From: bear
• Re: straw-man [was Re: arithmetic issues]
  • From: Paul Schlie
• Re: straw-man [was Re: arithmetic issues]
  • From: bear
• Re: straw-man [was Re: arithmetic issues]
  • From: Paul Schlie
• Re: Arithmetic issues - feedback
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Re: straw-man [was Re: arithmetic issues]
  • From: Alan Watson
• Re: straw-man [was Re: arithmetic issues]
  • From: Bradley Lucier
• Re: straw-man [was Re: arithmetic issues]
  • From: bear
• Re: straw-man [was Re: arithmetic issues]
  • From: Alan Watson
• Re: Arithmetic issues - feedback
  • From: bear
• Re: Arithmetic issues - feedback
  • From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
• Re: Arithmetic issues - feedback
  • From: John Cowan
• Questions about srfi-77 Generic Arithmetic
  • From: Bradley Lucier
• Re: Questions about srfi-77 Generic Arithmetic
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Re: Questions about srfi-77 Generic Arithmetic
  • From: William D Clinger
• Re: Questions about srfi-77 Generic Arithmetic
  • From: Bradley Lucier
• Re: Questions about srfi-77 Generic Arithmetic
  • From: William D Clinger
• Re: Questions about srfi-77 Generic Arithmetic
  • From: Bradley Lucier
• Re: Questions about srfi-77 Generic Arithmetic
  • From: William D Clinger
• Integer residue-classes [was: Questions about srfi-77 Generic Arithmetic]
  • From: Sebastian Egner
• Re: Integer residue-classes [was: Questions about srfi-77 Generic Arithmetic]
  • From: William D Clinger
• Re: Integer residue-classes [was: Questions about srfi-77 Generic Arithmetic]
  • From: William D Clinger
• Re: Integer residue-classes [was: Questions about srfi-77 Generic Arithmetic]
  • From: William D Clinger
• Re: Integer residue-classes [was: Questions about srfi-77 Generic Arithmetic]
  • From: Sebastian Egner
• unsubscribe
  • From: Sebastian Egner
• Re: Integer residue-classes [was: Questions about srfi-77 Generic Arithmetic]
  • From: William D Clinger
• div and mod.
  • From: bear
• Re: Integer residue-classes
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Re: Integer residue-classes
  • From: William D Clinger
• Re: Integer residue-classes
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Re: Integer residue-classes
  • From: John Cowan
• Re: Integer residue-classes
  • From: Paul Schlie
• Re: Integer residue-classes [was: Questions about srfi-77 Generic Arithmetic]
  • From: Bradley Lucier
• Multiple precisions of floating-point arithmetic
  • From: Bradley Lucier
• Re: Multiple precisions of floating-point arithmetic
  • From: bear
• Re: Multiple precisions of floating-point arithmetic
  • From: Bradley Lucier
• Re: Integer residue-classes
  • From: Paul Schlie
• implementations that can't represent infinities or NaNs
  • From: William D Clinger
• Re: Integer residue-classes
  • From: Paul Schlie
• miscellaneous request
  • From: Paul Schlie
• miscellaneous request (last one)
  • From: Paul Schlie
• Re: div and mod.
  • From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
• Optional base argument for LOG (and friends)
  • From: Jorgen Schaefer
• Re: Optional base argument for LOG (and friends)
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer
• SRFI 77 Revision available
  • From: David Van Horn
• Re: SRFI 77 Revision available
  • From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
• Re: SRFI 77 Revision available
  • From: David Van Horn
• Re: Optional base argument for LOG (and friends)
  • From: John Cowan
• fixnumXXX and fxXXX names, and other things
  • From: Marc Feeley
• Re: fixnumXXX and fxXXX names, and other things
  • From: William D Clinger
• Re: fixnumXXX and fxXXX names, and other things
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer
• Re: fixnumXXX and fxXXX names, and other things
  • From: William D Clinger
• Re: fixnumXXX and fxXXX names, and other things
  • From: Marc Feeley
• Re: fixnumXXX and fxXXX names, and other things
  • From: Per Bothner
• Re: fixnumXXX and fxXXX names, and other things
  • From: Marc Feeley
• Re: fixnumXXX and fxXXX names, and other things
  • From: William D Clinger
• Re: fixnumXXX and fxXXX names, and other things
  • From: John Cowan
• numerical conditioning MAGNITUDE and /
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer
• SRFI-77 with more than one flonum representation
  • From: Alan Watson
• Re: SRFI-77 with more than one flonum representation
  • From: John Cowan
• Re: fixnumXXX and fxXXX names, and other things
  • From: William D Clinger
• Re: fixnumXXX and fxXXX names, and other things
  • From: John Cowan
• Re: fixnumXXX and fxXXX names, and other things
  • From: Jorgen Schaefer
• Re: fixnumXXX and fxXXX names, and other things
  • From: Andre van Tonder
• Re: numerical conditioning MAGNITUDE and /
  • From: William D Clinger
• Re: numerical conditioning MAGNITUDE and /
  • From: John Cowan
• Re: numerical conditioning MAGNITUDE and /
  • From: William D Clinger
• Re: numerical conditioning MAGNITUDE and /
  • From: John Cowan
• Re: numerical conditioning MAGNITUDE and /
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer
• Re: numerical conditioning MAGNITUDE and /
  • From: William D Clinger
• Re: SRFI-77 with more than one flonum representation
  • From: Alan Watson
• Re: numerical conditioning MAGNITUDE and /
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer
• Re: numerical conditioning MAGNITUDE and /
  • From: Bradley Lucier
• Re: numerical conditioning MAGNITUDE and /
  • From: William D Clinger
• Re: SRFI-77 with more than one flonum representation
  • From: William D Clinger
• Re: Fresh syntax
  • From: Bradley Lucier
• Re: Fresh syntax
  • From: William D Clinger
• Re: SRFI-77 with more than one flonum representation
  • From: William D Clinger
• Handling of invalid arguments
  • From: Marc Feeley
• Re: Handling of invalid arguments
  • From: Bradley Lucier
• Re: Handling of invalid arguments
  • From: Marc Feeley
• Re: Handling of invalid arguments
  • From: William D Clinger
• Re: SRFI-77 with more than one flonum representation
  • From: Alan Watson
• Constant names
  • From: Alan Watson
• Re: SRFI-77 with more than one flonum representation
  • From: John Cowan
• ambiguous sign notation support?
  • From: Paul Schlie
• Re: SRFI-77 with more than one flonum representation
  • From: Alan Watson
• Re: SRFI-77 with more than one flonum representation
  • From: Alan Watson
• Re: ambiguous sign notation support?
  • From: William D Clinger
• Re: SRFI-77 with more than one flonum representation
  • From: William D Clinger
• Re: SRFI-77 with more than one flonum representation
  • From: Alan Watson
• Re: SRFI-77 with more than one flonum representation
  • From: Bradley Lucier
• Re: SRFI-77 with more than one flonum representation
  • From: Alan Watson
• Re: SRFI-77 with more than one flonum representation
  • From: William D Clinger
• Re: SRFI-77 with more than one flonum representation
  • From: Bradley Lucier
• Re: SRFI-77 with more than one flonum representation
  • From: William D Clinger
• Re: SRFI-77 with more than one flonum representation
  • From: Alan Watson
• Re: ambiguous sign notation support?
  • From: Paul Schlie
• number->string should use either no exponent or an e-exponent
  • From: Alan Watson
• Re: SRFI-77 with more than one flonum representation
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Re: SRFI-77 with more than one flonum representation
  • From: Michael Sperber
• div0 and mod0
  • From: Bradley Lucier
• fixnum-* operations
  • From: Bradley Lucier
• Some comments relating to ICFP contest
  • From: Andre van Tonder
• Re: Some comments relating to ICFP contest
  • From: Alex Shinn
• Re: Some comments relating to ICFP contest
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Re: Some comments relating to ICFP contest
  • From: Alan Watson
• Re: Some comments relating to ICFP contest
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Re: Some comments relating to ICFP contest
  • From: Andre van Tonder
• Re: Some comments relating to ICFP contest
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Re: Some comments relating to ICFP contest
  • From: Andre van Tonder
• Re: Some comments relating to ICFP contest
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Re: fixnum-* operations
  • From: William D Clinger
• Re: div0 and mod0
  • From: William D Clinger
• Re: div0 and mod0
  • From: Bradley Lucier
• Re: div0 and mod0
  • From: William D Clinger
• Re: Some comments relating to ICFP contest
  • From: bear