Mail Index
This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 77 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 77 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.
- naming convention
- meta-comment on typing
- minor comments
- Small omission
- Mixing safe and unsafe code
- Re: meta-comment on typing
- Re: meta-comment on typing
- bitwise operations
- Re: meta-comment on typing
- Re: meta-comment on typing
- Re: meta-comment on typing
- Re: meta-comment on typing
- From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: meta-comment on typing
- Re: meta-comment on typing
- [SRFI 77] integer-length and integer-sqrt
- Re: meta-comment on typing
- Re: meta-comment on typing
- Re: integer-length and integer-sqrt
- Integers as Bits [was Re: integer-length]
- Re: meta-comment on typing
- safe/unsafe mode
- implementation categories, exact rationals
- Re: implementation categories, exact rationals
- Re: implementation categories, exact rationals
- Re: implementation categories, exact rationals
- Re: implementation categories, exact rationals
- Re: meta-comment on typing
- Re: meta-comment on typing
- Re: meta-comment on typing
- Re: meta-comment on typing
- From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: integer-length and integer-sqrt
- Re: implementation categories, exact rationals
- Re: implementation categories, exact rationals
- Re: integer-length and integer-sqrt
- Re: implementation categories, exact rationals
- Arithmetic issues
- Re: Arithmetic issues
- Re: Arithmetic issues - feedback
- Re: Arithmetic issues
- Re: Arithmetic issues - feedback
- Re: Arithmetic issues - feedback
- Re: meta-comment on typing
- Re: Arithmetic issues
- Some preliminary comments
- Re: meta-comment on typing
- Re: Arithmetic issues
- Re: Arithmetic issues
- Re: Arithmetic issues
- Re: Arithmetic issues
- Re: Arithmetic issues
- Re: Arithmetic issues
- FIXNUM (aka Re: Arithmetic issues)
- Re: Arithmetic issues
- Re: Arithmetic issues
- Re: Arithmetic issues
- My comments
- From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: My comments
- Re: My comments
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
- Re: My comments
- Re: My comments
- Re: My comments
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
- Re: My comments
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
- Re: My comments
- From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: My comments
- Re: My comments
- Re: My comments
- From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: My comments
- Re: My comments
- Exactness (was Re: My comments)
- Re: Exactness
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
- Re: Exactness
- From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: Exactness
- Re: Exactness
- Re: Exactness
- From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: Exactness
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
- Re: Exactness
- From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- arithmetic issues
- Re: arithmetic issues
- Re: arithmetic issues
- Re: arithmetic issues
- From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: Exactness
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
- Re: Exactness
- From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: arithmetic issues
- Re: Exactness
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
- Re: arithmetic issues
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
- Re: Exactness
- From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: Exactness
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
- Re: Exactness
- From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: Exactness
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
- Re: Exactness
- From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: Exactness
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
- Re: arithmetic issues
- Re: Exactness
- From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: arithmetic issues
- From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: Exactness
- Re: Exactness
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
- Re: arithmetic issues
- Re: arithmetic issues
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
- Re: arithmetic issues
- Re: arithmetic issues
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
- Re: arithmetic issues
- Re: arithmetic issues
- Re: arithmetic issues
- Re: arithmetic issues
- Re: Exactness
- From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- +nan.0 problems
- +nan.0 contradiction
- Re: arithmetic issues
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
- Re: arithmetic issues
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
- Re: Exactness
- Re: Exactness
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
- multiplicative inverse of 0.0
- Re: Exactness
- From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: multiplicative inverse of 0.0
- From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- multiplicative inverse of 0.0
- Re: +nan.0 problems
- From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: Exactness
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
- Re: +nan.0 problems
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
- Re: Exactness
- Re: +nan.0 contradiction
- Re: multiplicative inverse of 0.0
- Re: arithmetic issues
- Re: arithmetic issues
- Re: +nan.0 problems
- Re: arithmetic issues
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
- Re: +nan.0 problems
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
- Re: arithmetic issues
- Re: arithmetic issues
- Testing the reference implementation
- Re: +nan.0 problems
- Re: arithmetic issues
- Re: Exactness
- Re: multiplicative inverse of 0.0
- Re: +nan.0 problems
- Re: multiplicative inverse of 0.0
- Is exact 0 "stronger" than inexact 0.0?
- Re: Is exact 0 "stronger" than inexact 0.0?
- From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: arithmetic issues
- Re: arithmetic issues
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
- Re: arithmetic issues
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
- Re: Exactness
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
- Re: +nan.0 problems
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
- Re: arithmetic issues
- Re: arithmetic issues
- Re: arithmetic issues
- Re: arithmetic issues
- Re: arithmetic issues
- From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: arithmetic issues
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
- Re: arithmetic issues
- Re: arithmetic issues
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
- Re: arithmetic issues
- From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: arithmetic issues
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
- Re: arithmetic issues
- From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: arithmetic issues
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
- Re: arithmetic issues
- From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: arithmetic issues
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
- Re: arithmetic issues
- From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: arithmetic issues
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
- Re: arithmetic issues
- From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: arithmetic issues
- Re: arithmetic issues
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
- Re: arithmetic issues
- Re: arithmetic issues
- From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: arithmetic issues
- Re: arithmetic issues
- Re: arithmetic issues
- Re: arithmetic issues
- From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: arithmetic issues
- Re: arithmetic issues
- Re: arithmetic issues
- Re: arithmetic issues
- Re: arithmetic issues
- Re: +nan.0 problems
- Re: arithmetic issues
- Re: arithmetic issues
- Re: arithmetic issues
- Re: arithmetic issues
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
- Re: arithmetic issues
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
- Re: arithmetic issues
- From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: arithmetic issues
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
- Re: arithmetic issues
- Re: Testing the reference implementation
- reading NaNs
- Re: arithmetic issues
- Re: reading NaNs
- Re: reading NaNs
- From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: reading NaNs
- Re: reading NaNs
- Re: reading NaNs
- Re: reading NaNs
- Re: reading NaNs
- Re: reading NaNs
- Re: reading NaNs
- Re: reading NaNs
- Re: reading NaNs
- Re: reading NaNs
- From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: reading NaNs
- From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: arithmetic issues
- Re: arithmetic issues
- Common Lisp solved this problem 20 years ago
- Re: Common Lisp solved this problem 20 years ago
- Re: arithmetic issues
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
- Re: arithmetic issues
- Re: arithmetic issues
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
- Re: arithmetic issues
- Re: Common Lisp solved this problem 20 years ago
- From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: Common Lisp solved this problem 20 years ago
- Re: arithmetic issues
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
- Re: arithmetic issues
- Re: Common Lisp solved this problem 20 years ago
- Re: Common Lisp solved this problem 20 years ago
- Re: Common Lisp solved this problem 20 years ago
- Re: Common Lisp solved this problem 20 years ago
- Re: Common Lisp solved this problem 20 years ago
- Re: Common Lisp solved this problem 20 years ago
- From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: Common Lisp solved this problem 20 years ago
- Re: reading NaNs
- Re: reading NaNs
- Re: reading NaNs
- Re: reading NaNs
- From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: Common Lisp solved this problem 20 years ago
- Re: Common Lisp solved this problem 20 years ago
- Re: reading NaNs
- Re: Common Lisp solved this problem 20 years ago
- Re: Common Lisp solved this problem 20 years ago
- Re: Common Lisp solved this problem 20 years ago
- Re: Common Lisp solved this problem 20 years ago
- Re: Common Lisp solved this problem 20 years ago
- Re: Common Lisp solved this problem 20 years ago
- Re: Common Lisp solved this problem 20 years ago
- From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: reading NaNs
- From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: reading NaNs
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
- Re: Common Lisp solved this problem 20 years ago
- Re: reading NaNs
- Re: Common Lisp solved this problem 20 years ago
- Re: Common Lisp solved this problem 20 years ago
- Re: reading NaNs
- From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: reading NaNs
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
- Re: reading NaNs
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
- Re: Common Lisp solved this problem 20 years ago
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
- Re: Common Lisp solved this problem 20 years ago
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
- Re: reading NaNs
- Re: reading NaNs
- Re: arithmetic issues
- Re: Common Lisp solved this problem 20 years ago
- Re: Common Lisp solved this problem 20 years ago
- Re: reading NaNs
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
- Re: Common Lisp solved this problem 20 years ago
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
- Re: Common Lisp solved this problem 20 years ago
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
- Re: reading NaNs
- From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: Common Lisp solved this problem 20 years ago
- Re: reading NaNs
- Re: reading NaNs
- From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: Common Lisp solved this problem 20 years ago
- Re: reading NaNs
- Re: reading NaNs
- Re: reading NaNs
- Re: Common Lisp solved this problem 20 years ago
- Re: reading NaNs
- Re: Common Lisp solved this problem 20 years ago
- Re: reading NaNs
- Re: Common Lisp solved this problem 20 years ago
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
- Re: Common Lisp solved this problem 20 years ago
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
- Re: reading NaNs
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
- Re: Common Lisp solved this problem 20 years ago
- Re: reading NaNs
- Re: Common Lisp solved this problem 20 years ago
- Re: Common Lisp solved this problem 20 years ago
- Re: reading NaNs
- From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: reading NaNs
- Re: reading NaNs
- Re: reading NaNs
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
- Re: reading NaNs
- From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: reading NaNs
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
- Re: reading NaNs
- Re: reading NaNs
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
- Re: reading NaNs
- Re: reading NaNs
- From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: reading NaNs
- Re: reading NaNs
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
- Re: reading NaNs
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
- Re: reading NaNs
- Re: reading NaNs
- Re: Arithmetic issues
- Re: Arithmetic issues
- Re: Arithmetic issues
- Re: Arithmetic issues
- NaN's
- Re: NaN's
- From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: NaN's
- Re: reading NaNs
- Re: NaN's
- From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Error objects in general
- Re: Error objects in general
- From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: reading NaNs
- Re: Error objects in general
- Re: arithmetic issues
- Re: NaN's
- Re: reading NaNs
- Re: reading NaNs
- Re: Error objects in general
- Re: Error objects in general
- Re: Error objects in general
- Re: Error objects in general
- Re: reading NaNs
- Re: reading NaNs
- Re: Error objects in general
- Re: Error objects in general
- Re: Error objects in general
- Re: Error objects in general
- Re: Error objects in general
- Re: Error objects in general
- Re: Error objects in general
- From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: Error objects in general
- Re: Error objects in general
- Re: Error objects in general
- Re: Testing the reference implementation
- Re: Testing the reference implementation
- (- 1.0 1.0) => 0 ; not +0.0 ?
- Unifying the two generic arithmetic alternatives
- Re: Unifying the two generic arithmetic alternatives
- From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: Unifying the two generic arithmetic alternatives
- Re: Unifying the two generic arithmetic alternatives
- Re: Unifying the two generic arithmetic alternatives
- Re: Unifying the two generic arithmetic alternatives
- Re: Unifying the two generic arithmetic alternatives
- Re: Unifying the two generic arithmetic alternatives
- Re: Unifying the two generic arithmetic alternatives
- From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Contagious Inexactness, revision 2
- Re: Contagious Inexactness, revision 2
- From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: Contagious Inexactness, revision 2
- Generic Exact Arithmetic
- Re: arithmetic issues
- Re: arithmetic issues
- Re: Testing the reference implementation
- Contagious Inexactness: dealing with conditionals
- Re: Testing the reference implementation
- Re: Testing the reference implementation
- Re: Testing the reference implementation
- Re: Testing the reference implementation
- Re: Testing the reference implementation
- Re: Testing the reference implementation
- Re: safe/unsafe mode
- Re: safe/unsafe mode
- Re: safe/unsafe mode
- Re: safe/unsafe mode
- Re: safe/unsafe mode
- Re: safe/unsafe mode
- Draft extension
- Re: arithmetic issues
- Re: arithmetic issues
- Re: arithmetic issues
- Re: arithmetic issues
- Re: arithmetic issues
- Re: arithmetic issues
- Re: arithmetic issues
- Re: arithmetic issues
- Re: arithmetic issues
- Re: arithmetic issues
- Re: arithmetic issues
- Re: arithmetic issues
- Re: arithmetic issues
- Re: arithmetic issues
- Re: arithmetic issues
- Re: arithmetic issues
- Re: arithmetic issues
- Re: arithmetic issues
- From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: arithmetic issues
- Re: arithmetic issues
- Re: arithmetic issues
- Re: arithmetic issues
- Re: arithmetic issues
- Re: arithmetic issues
- Re: arithmetic issues
- Re: arithmetic issues
- Re: straw-man [was Re: arithmetic issues]
- Re: straw-man [was Re: arithmetic issues]
- Re: arithmetic issues
- Re: arithmetic issues
- Re: arithmetic issues
- Re: arithmetic issues
- Re: straw-man [was Re: arithmetic issues]
- Re: arithmetic issues
- Re: arithmetic issues
- Re: arithmetic issues
- From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: arithmetic issues
- Re: arithmetic issues
- Re: arithmetic issues
- Re: arithmetic issues
- From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: arithmetic issues
- Re: arithmetic issues
- Re: straw-man [was Re: arithmetic issues]
- Re: straw-man [was Re: arithmetic issues]
- Re: straw-man [was Re: arithmetic issues]
- Re: straw-man [was Re: arithmetic issues]
- Re: straw-man [was Re: arithmetic issues]
- Re: Arithmetic issues - feedback
- Re: straw-man [was Re: arithmetic issues]
- Re: straw-man [was Re: arithmetic issues]
- Re: straw-man [was Re: arithmetic issues]
- Re: straw-man [was Re: arithmetic issues]
- Re: Arithmetic issues - feedback
- Re: Arithmetic issues - feedback
- From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: Arithmetic issues - feedback
- Questions about srfi-77 Generic Arithmetic
- Re: Questions about srfi-77 Generic Arithmetic
- Re: Questions about srfi-77 Generic Arithmetic
- Re: Questions about srfi-77 Generic Arithmetic
- Re: Questions about srfi-77 Generic Arithmetic
- Re: Questions about srfi-77 Generic Arithmetic
- Re: Questions about srfi-77 Generic Arithmetic
- Integer residue-classes [was: Questions about srfi-77 Generic Arithmetic]
- Re: Integer residue-classes [was: Questions about srfi-77 Generic Arithmetic]
- Re: Integer residue-classes [was: Questions about srfi-77 Generic Arithmetic]
- Re: Integer residue-classes [was: Questions about srfi-77 Generic Arithmetic]
- Re: Integer residue-classes [was: Questions about srfi-77 Generic Arithmetic]
- unsubscribe
- Re: Integer residue-classes [was: Questions about srfi-77 Generic Arithmetic]
- div and mod.
- Re: Integer residue-classes
- Re: Integer residue-classes
- Re: Integer residue-classes
- Re: Integer residue-classes
- Re: Integer residue-classes
- Re: Integer residue-classes [was: Questions about srfi-77 Generic Arithmetic]
- Multiple precisions of floating-point arithmetic
- Re: Multiple precisions of floating-point arithmetic
- Re: Multiple precisions of floating-point arithmetic
- Re: Integer residue-classes
- implementations that can't represent infinities or NaNs
- Re: Integer residue-classes
- miscellaneous request
- miscellaneous request (last one)
- Re: div and mod.
- From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Optional base argument for LOG (and friends)
- Re: Optional base argument for LOG (and friends)
- SRFI 77 Revision available
- Re: SRFI 77 Revision available
- From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: SRFI 77 Revision available
- Re: Optional base argument for LOG (and friends)
- fixnumXXX and fxXXX names, and other things
- Re: fixnumXXX and fxXXX names, and other things
- Re: fixnumXXX and fxXXX names, and other things
- Re: fixnumXXX and fxXXX names, and other things
- Re: fixnumXXX and fxXXX names, and other things
- Re: fixnumXXX and fxXXX names, and other things
- Re: fixnumXXX and fxXXX names, and other things
- Re: fixnumXXX and fxXXX names, and other things
- Re: fixnumXXX and fxXXX names, and other things
- numerical conditioning MAGNITUDE and /
- SRFI-77 with more than one flonum representation
- Re: SRFI-77 with more than one flonum representation
- Re: fixnumXXX and fxXXX names, and other things
- Re: fixnumXXX and fxXXX names, and other things
- Re: fixnumXXX and fxXXX names, and other things
- Re: fixnumXXX and fxXXX names, and other things
- Re: numerical conditioning MAGNITUDE and /
- Re: numerical conditioning MAGNITUDE and /
- Re: numerical conditioning MAGNITUDE and /
- Re: numerical conditioning MAGNITUDE and /
- Re: numerical conditioning MAGNITUDE and /
- Re: numerical conditioning MAGNITUDE and /
- Re: SRFI-77 with more than one flonum representation
- Re: numerical conditioning MAGNITUDE and /
- Re: numerical conditioning MAGNITUDE and /
- Re: numerical conditioning MAGNITUDE and /
- Re: SRFI-77 with more than one flonum representation
- Re: Fresh syntax
- Re: Fresh syntax
- Re: SRFI-77 with more than one flonum representation
- Handling of invalid arguments
- Re: Handling of invalid arguments
- Re: Handling of invalid arguments
- Re: Handling of invalid arguments
- Re: SRFI-77 with more than one flonum representation
- Constant names
- Re: SRFI-77 with more than one flonum representation
- ambiguous sign notation support?
- Re: SRFI-77 with more than one flonum representation
- Re: SRFI-77 with more than one flonum representation
- Re: ambiguous sign notation support?
- Re: SRFI-77 with more than one flonum representation
- Re: SRFI-77 with more than one flonum representation
- Re: SRFI-77 with more than one flonum representation
- Re: SRFI-77 with more than one flonum representation
- Re: SRFI-77 with more than one flonum representation
- Re: SRFI-77 with more than one flonum representation
- Re: SRFI-77 with more than one flonum representation
- Re: SRFI-77 with more than one flonum representation
- Re: ambiguous sign notation support?
- number->string should use either no exponent or an e-exponent
- Re: SRFI-77 with more than one flonum representation
- Re: SRFI-77 with more than one flonum representation
- div0 and mod0
- fixnum-* operations
- Some comments relating to ICFP contest
- Re: Some comments relating to ICFP contest
- Re: Some comments relating to ICFP contest
- Re: Some comments relating to ICFP contest
- Re: Some comments relating to ICFP contest
- Re: Some comments relating to ICFP contest
- Re: Some comments relating to ICFP contest
- Re: Some comments relating to ICFP contest
- Re: Some comments relating to ICFP contest
- Re: fixnum-* operations
- Re: div0 and mod0
- Re: div0 and mod0
- Re: div0 and mod0
- Re: Some comments relating to ICFP contest
Mail converted by MHonArc