[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

*To*: srfi-77@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx*Subject*: Re: arithmetic issues*From*: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@xxxxxxxxxx>*Date*: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 15:30:26 -0700*Delivered-to*: srfi-77@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx*In-reply-to*: <874q773m6s.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Marcin Kowalczyk's message of "Mon, 24 Oct 2005 00:25:47 +0200")*References*: <20051021145326.816C11B77BB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20051021155906.GC16464@NYCMJCOWA2> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0510210910130.18969@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20051022020312.GB5632@NYCMJCOWA2> <87mzl2mhd3.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20051022023824.GD5632@NYCMJCOWA2> <87r7adv5ii.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20051023160247.GC7728@NYCMJCOWA2> <8764roowey.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <87br1g2d96.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <87k6g4m0w6.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <874q773m6s.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>*User-agent*: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)

Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk <qrczak@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Why no current implementation uses sparse arrays as the representation > of (some) vectors? Or does any? Maybe none has gotten around to it? > If no implementation does a particular thing, then perhaps it's not > a wise choice to do. That's a fundamentally bogus argument. If there's a reason it's unwise, then let's hear it. It needs to be a reason why it's *always* unwise, not just why it's unwise in general-purpose Scheme systems. (Though for the life of me I can't think of any reason there either.) No Scheme implementation that I know of supports writing Scheme programs that include identifiers written in the Devanagari script. But that doesn't mean it's an unwise thing to do; it's just that there aren't many Sanskrit users of Scheme yet. > Leaving room for it only reduces programmer confidence and > encourages them to rely on common practice instead of on standard > guarantees. "Reduces programmer confidence"? Huh? Programmer confidence in what? It's you that seems to have mistaken common practice for a standard guarantee. Rewriting the standard so that it standardizes common practice is not the solution. Thomas

**References**:**arithmetic issues***From:*Aubrey Jaffer

**Re: arithmetic issues***From:*John.Cowan

**Re: arithmetic issues***From:*bear

**Re: arithmetic issues***From:*John.Cowan

**Re: arithmetic issues***From:*Thomas Bushnell BSG

**Re: arithmetic issues***From:*John.Cowan

**Re: arithmetic issues***From:*Thomas Bushnell BSG

**Re: arithmetic issues***From:*John.Cowan

**Re: arithmetic issues***From:*Thomas Bushnell BSG

**Re: arithmetic issues***From:*Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk

**Re: arithmetic issues***From:*Thomas Bushnell BSG

**Re: arithmetic issues***From:*Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk

- Prev by Date:
**Re: arithmetic issues** - Next by Date:
**Re: arithmetic issues** - Previous by thread:
**Re: arithmetic issues** - Next by thread:
**+nan.0 problems** - Index(es):