[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 77 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 77 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.

*To*: srfi-77@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx*Subject*: Re: arithmetic issues*From*: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@xxxxxxxxxx>*Date*: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 19:01:23 -0700*Delivered-to*: srfi-77@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx*In-reply-to*: <87ll0jpu0q.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Marcin Kowalczyk's message of "Mon, 24 Oct 2005 03:45:41 +0200")*References*: <20051021145326.816C11B77BB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20051021155906.GC16464@NYCMJCOWA2> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0510210910130.18969@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20051022011713.1F22A1B77BB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <87vezqmjkq.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20051022232548.5A2971B77BB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <873bmtxdnm.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20051023181854.4E7DD1B77BB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <871x2cowe8.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20051023195403.A50AF1B77BB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <435BEC21.60509@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20051023205012.BFD241B77BB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <87zmoz27dg.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <87hdb7kgmk.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <87k6g3zw34.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <871x2bkfj7.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <8764rnu45b.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <87br1fiv26.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <87ll0jpu0q.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>*User-agent*: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)

Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk <qrczak@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Sigh. With this attitude I have no hope in getting a decent portable > numeric system from Scheme. Implementations are on their own. Time to > move to more sane languages. Fortunately, your huff doesn't prevent others from figuring out a good way to implement IEEE within Scheme. It seems to me that what you want is not portable IEEE floating point in Scheme (I have heard nobody say that this would be a bad idea). It seems what you really want is to force every Scheme system to provide such (which is simply never going to happen, since we want to retain the ability to have an integer-only Scheme), or to force users to use IEEE floating point only. I favor a system in which users request the features they want, and if they don't care, the system gives them whatever is efficient and convenient. I can't see why that doesn't suit you. Thomas

**References**:**arithmetic issues***From:*Aubrey Jaffer

**Re: arithmetic issues***From:*John.Cowan

**Re: arithmetic issues***From:*bear

**Re: arithmetic issues***From:*Aubrey Jaffer

**Re: arithmetic issues***From:*Thomas Bushnell BSG

**Re: arithmetic issues***From:*Aubrey Jaffer

**Re: arithmetic issues***From:*Thomas Bushnell BSG

**Re: arithmetic issues***From:*Aubrey Jaffer

**Re: arithmetic issues***From:*Thomas Bushnell BSG

**Re: arithmetic issues***From:*Aubrey Jaffer

**Re: arithmetic issues***From:*Jens Axel Søgaard

**Re: arithmetic issues***From:*Aubrey Jaffer

**Re: arithmetic issues***From:*Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk

**Re: arithmetic issues***From:*Thomas Bushnell BSG

**Re: arithmetic issues***From:*Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk

**Re: arithmetic issues***From:*Thomas Bushnell BSG

**Re: arithmetic issues***From:*Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk

**Re: arithmetic issues***From:*Thomas Bushnell BSG

**Re: arithmetic issues***From:*Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk

- Prev by Date:
**Re: arithmetic issues** - Next by Date:
**Re: arithmetic issues** - Previous by thread:
**Re: arithmetic issues** - Next by thread:
**Re: arithmetic issues** - Index(es):