[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Unifying the two generic arithmetic alternatives

This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 77 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 77 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.

Andrew Wilcox <awilcox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> To take an example of [Egner et al. 2004], (< x y) in this proposal
> returns an *inexact* boolean, if either X or Y is inexact.

A boolean is almost always used to choose control flow. Since you
can't make control flow inexact, inexactness is not really contagious.
It can't be. Inexact booleans don't add any real value.

[More comments later.]

   __("<         Marcin Kowalczyk
   \__/       qrczak@xxxxxxxxxx
    ^^     http://qrnik.knm.org.pl/~qrczak/