[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: reading NaNs
| Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 10:34:53 -0700
| From: Per Bothner <per@xxxxxxxxxxx>
| Aubrey Jaffer wrote:
| > In an implementation which boxes flonums, NaNs aren't a single value;
| > EQ? and EQV? are *not* guaranteed to return #t given two NaNs.
| eq? is not guaranteed to return #t given two equal flonums
| eqv? *is* guaranteed to return #t given two equal flonums.
| NaNs should be the same: two NaNs that have the same bit-pattern
| and size must compare as eqv? but not necessarily eq?.
Thanks for the correction; it was my mistake.