[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: +nan.0 problems

Aubrey Jaffer scripsit:

> SRFI-77 states:
>   This SRFI regards +nan.0 as a real number whose value is so
>   indeterminate that it might represent any real number within the
>   closed interval [-inf.0,+inf.0].

Thanks for pointing this out.  The SRFI is of course wrong:  the paradigm
case of +nan.0 is (/ 0.0 0.0), and the value of this is not any of the
real numbers.

John Cowan  www.reutershealth.com  www.ccil.org/~cowan  jcowan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Arise, you prisoners of Windows / Arise, you slaves of Redmond, Wash,
The day and hour soon are coming / When all the IT folks say "Gosh!"
It isn't from a clever lawsuit / That Windowsland will finally fall,
But thousands writing open source code / Like mice who nibble through a wall.
        --The Linux-nationale by Greg Baker