[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: reading NaNs

Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> To the contrary, I think requesting *any* model should be explicit.
> Can you help me out here by explaining *why* it is so painful to be
> explicit?

Because I see no sane way of *switching* models. They shouldn't be
changed, they should be added (adding new numeric types, extending
existing operations - not replacing).

I don't know what to do about literal syntax.

   __("<         Marcin Kowalczyk
   \__/       qrczak@xxxxxxxxxx
    ^^     http://qrnik.knm.org.pl/~qrczak/