[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: arithmetic issues

This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 77 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 77 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.

My use of "atomic" was confusing because it does have precedence as meaning "not a pair". However, I suspect that usage dates back to when procedures were not first class.

I explained what I meant a few messages later:

> Perhaps the property I am looking for that of is objects which are
> eqv? according to their *value* not their *location*. This includes
> booleans, characters, numbers, nulls, and symbols.

Sorry for the confusion.


Dr Alan Watson
Centro de Radioastronomía y Astrofísica
Universidad Astronómico Nacional de México