[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 77 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 77 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.

*To*: William D Clinger <will@xxxxxxxxxxx>*Subject*: Re: arithmetic issues*From*: Alan Watson <a.watson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>*Date*: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 11:57:55 -0600*Cc*: srfi-77@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx*Delivered-to*: srfi-77@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx*In-reply-to*: <E1EznXw-0002a6-5A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>*Organization*: Centro de Radioastronomía y Astrofísica UNAM*References*: <E1EznXw-0002a6-5A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>*User-agent*: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051113)

William D Clinger wrote:

When I say that requiring only the fixnum/flonum foundation is an attractive option for R6RS, second only to requiring the full tower, I certainly do not mean to imply that systems would be forbidden to support numbers that are neither fixnum nor flonum. In particular, I do not mean to suggest dropping the part of R5RS section 6.2.3 I quoted above.

Regards, Alan -- Dr Alan Watson Centro de Radioastronomía y Astrofísica Universidad Astronómico Nacional de México

**References**:**Re: arithmetic issues***From:*William D Clinger

- Prev by Date:
**Re: arithmetic issues** - Next by Date:
**Re: arithmetic issues** - Previous by thread:
**Re: arithmetic issues** - Next by thread:
**Re: arithmetic issues** - Index(es):