[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: arithmetic issues

Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Alan Watson <a.watson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

NaNs are atoms -- they have no context or stucture, just a single value. With the understandable exception of the eof object (and as has been noted, this is exception is not universal), Lisps and Schemes tranditionally provide read syntax for atoms. So, tradition suggests that we should have a read syntax for NaNs.

Hogwash. Procedures are atoms.

Wrong.  Closures can be modified.
	--Per Bothner
per@xxxxxxxxxxx   http://per.bothner.com/