[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: arithmetic issues



Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk <qrczak@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> It is an explanation of why your appeal to tradition is ill-founded;
>> the tradition actually points the opposite way.
>
> There is no tradition in not providing a read syntax for "error
> objects".

Really?  Can you give me some pointers to the Lisp systems which do
provide read syntax for all the error objects they have?