[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Error objects in general

This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 77 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 77 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.

On Sun, 30 Oct 2005, Taylor Campbell wrote:

>  Why does it not suffice for READ to return objects that were
> written and to signal, not to return, conditions for a condition
> handler to receive?

In the absence of any standard signalling mechanism that's ever made
it into an R*RS report, this is a joke, right?