[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: reading NaNs



Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk <qrczak@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> Wrong.  There may actually be users who care about this which would
>> like something other than IEEE.  It does happen, you know.
>
> There is no other model competing for being the default. This means
> that it's requesting other models which should be explicit.

To the contrary, I think requesting *any* model should be explicit.

Can you help me out here by explaining *why* it is so painful to be
explicit?