[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Handling of invalid arguments

On Jun 29, 2006, at 9:15 AM, Marc Feeley wrote:

I have noticed that the specification of flexpt, flsqrt, flatan and many other procedures may return a meaningless result for certain ranges of arguments.

I think "that's not a bug, that's a feature," to coin a phrase. I believe the intention is to let

(flsqrt -1.0)

return whatever the hardware sqrt function returns (a NaN in IEEE 754 arithmetic) rather than

> (sqrt -1.0)

which is what Gambit returns. I believe the intent is to somehow map the <math.h> C functions to Scheme functions; any author of the SRFI want to comment here?

In other words, this defines a new set of underspecified procedures that return what expt, sqrt, atan, ... would return if the arguments are within a certain range (I'm not sure this is spelled out explicitly), but which can return almost anything else for other arguments.