Mail Index
This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 115 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 115 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.
- Re: ANN: SRFI 155: Scheme Regular Expressions
- Reference implementation dependencies?
- Small inconsistency
- Re: Reference implementation dependencies?
- Re: ANN: SRFI 155: Scheme Regular Expressions
- Re: Reference implementation dependencies?
- Match-result submatch extraction is weird
- Re: ANN: SRFI 155: Scheme Regular Expressions
- Re: Small inconsistency
- Re: Reference implementation dependencies?
- "rx"
- Escaping literal strings
- Re: Match-result submatch extraction is weird
- Re: ANN: SRFI 155: Scheme Regular Expressions
- Re: "rx"
- Re: "rx"
- Re: Escaping literal strings
- Re: Escaping literal strings
- Re: Escaping literal strings
- Re: "rx"
- repeating patterns
- benefits of SRE syntax
- Re: benefits of SRE syntax
- Re: benefits of SRE syntax
- Re: benefits of SRE syntax
- Re: benefits of SRE syntax
- boundary assertions
- repeating patterns and ...
- w/ascii and w/unicode
- sequences
- w/case and w/nocase
- Re: boundary assertions
- Re: repeating patterns and ...
- Re: benefits of SRE syntax
- Re: repeating patterns
- Re: w/ascii and w/unicode
- Re: sequences
- Re: w/ascii and w/unicode
- Re: w/ascii and w/unicode
- Re: "rx"
- Re: benefits of SRE syntax
- Two typos
- Re: Two typos
- Re: benefits of SRE syntax
- Re: Two typos
- Re: "rx"
- Re: benefits of SRE syntax
- Re: benefits of SRE syntax
- Re: benefits of SRE syntax
- Re: benefits of SRE syntax
- SRFI-115 issues
- SRFI 115 editorial
- Re: "rx"
- Re: "rx"
- Re: SRFI-115 issues
- Re: SRFI 115 editorial
- Re: "rx"
- Re: SRFI-115 issues
- Re: SRFI 115 editorial
- Re: SRFI-115 issues
- Re: SRFI 115 editorial
- Re: SRFI-115 issues
- Re: SRFI-115 issues
- Effect of string mutation on submatch extraction
- Re: Effect of string mutation on submatch extraction
- updated draft
- Re: updated draft
- Re: updated draft
- Re: updated draft
- Re: updated draft
- Re: updated draft
- integrating PCREs
- regexp and valid-sre?
- Re: integrating PCREs
- Re: regexp and valid-sre?
- english names for symbolic SREs
- Re: regexp and valid-sre?
- Re: english names for symbolic SREs
- Re: english names for symbolic SREs
- Re: english names for symbolic SREs
- Re: integrating PCREs
- Re: regexp and valid-sre?
- Re: regexp and valid-sre?
- Re: regexp and valid-sre?
- Re: regexp and valid-sre?
- Re: regexp and valid-sre?
- Re: english names for symbolic SREs
- Re: regexp and valid-sre?
- Re: regexp and valid-sre?
- Re: regexp and valid-sre?
- Re: regexp and valid-sre?
- Re: regexp and valid-sre?
- Re: regexp and valid-sre?
- Re: english names for symbolic SREs
- Re: regexp and valid-sre?
- Re: english names for symbolic SREs
- Re: regexp and valid-sre?
- Re: integrating PCREs
- Re: regexp and valid-sre?
- Re: english names for symbolic SREs
- Re: integrating PCREs
- Re: english names for symbolic SREs
- Re: regexp and valid-sre?
- Re: integrating PCREs
- Re: regexp and valid-sre?
- Re: integrating PCREs
- Re: integrating PCREs
- Re: regexp and valid-sre?
- Re: english names for symbolic SREs
- Re: english names for symbolic SREs
- Re: english names for symbolic SREs
- Re: english names for symbolic SREs
- Re: english names for symbolic SREs
- Re: english names for symbolic SREs
- Re: english names for symbolic SREs
- Re: english names for symbolic SREs
- Re: english names for symbolic SREs
- Re: regexp and valid-sre?
- Re: regexp and valid-sre?
- Re: english names for symbolic SREs
- Re: english names for symbolic SREs
- Re: english names for symbolic SREs
- Re: english names for symbolic SREs
- Re: english names for symbolic SREs
- Re: english names for symbolic SREs
- Re: updated draft
- Re: updated draft
- Re: english names for symbolic SREs
- Re: english names for symbolic SREs
- Re: regexp and valid-sre?
- Re: english names for symbolic SREs
- Re: english names for symbolic SREs
- Re: english names for symbolic SREs
- Re: english names for symbolic SREs
- Re: english names for symbolic SREs
- Re: english names for symbolic SREs
- TR29 word boundary use cases
- Re: english names for symbolic SREs
- Re: english names for symbolic SREs
- Re: english names for symbolic SREs
- new srfi 115 draft available
- Re: TR29 word boundary use cases
- Re: TR29 word boundary use cases
- Re: TR29 word boundary use cases
- Re: TR29 word boundary use cases
- Re: TR29 word boundary use cases
- Re: TR29 word boundary use cases
- Status of SRFI 115?
- Re: Status of SRFI 115?
- new draft of SRFI 115
- Re: new draft of SRFI 115
- revised w/nocase text, considering titlecase and cased
- one last issue - non-capturing
- Re: one last issue - non-capturing
- Re: one last issue - non-capturing
- Re: one last issue - non-capturing
- Re: one last issue - non-capturing
- Re: one last issue - non-capturing
- Re: revised w/nocase text, considering titlecase and cased
- Re: revised w/nocase text, considering titlecase and cased
- Re: revised w/nocase text, considering titlecase and cased
- Re: revised w/nocase text, considering titlecase and cased
- Re: revised w/nocase text, considering titlecase and cased
- Re: revised w/nocase text, considering titlecase and cased
- Re: revised w/nocase text, considering titlecase and cased
- Re: revised w/nocase text, considering titlecase and cased
- Should SRFI-115 character sets match extended grapheme clusters?
- Re: Should SRFI-115 character sets match extended grapheme clusters?
- Re: Should SRFI-115 character sets match extended grapheme clusters?
- Re: Should SRFI-115 character sets match extended grapheme clusters?
- Re: Should SRFI-115 character sets match extended grapheme clusters?
- Re: Should SRFI-115 character sets match extended grapheme clusters?
- Re: Should SRFI-115 character sets match extended grapheme clusters?
- Re: Should SRFI-115 character sets match extended grapheme clusters?
- Re: revised w/nocase text, considering titlecase and cased
- Re: revised w/nocase text, considering titlecase and cased
- Re: Should SRFI-115 character sets match extended grapheme clusters?
- Re: revised w/nocase text, considering titlecase and cased
- Re: revised w/nocase text, considering titlecase and cased
- Re: revised w/nocase text, considering titlecase and cased
- new draft available
- Re: new draft available
- Re: new draft available
- Re: new draft available
- Re: new draft available
- Re: new draft available
- Re: new draft available
- Re: new draft available
- Missing SRE component in BNF
- Re: Missing SRE component in BNF
Mail converted by MHonArc