This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 115 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 115 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.
On 10/16/2013 11:44 AM, Michael Montague wrote:I think structured regular expressions make sense when integrated
Maybe I am being a heretic, but what are the benefits of the SRE syntax?
with a general pattern-matching framework (by which I mean something
like http://docs.racket-lang.org/reference/match.html). Also,
sub-matches should produce variable bindings.
Without that, I also see little value is yet another ad hoc
string-only pattern-matching syntax, which is likely to
be have different syntax from any general pattern-matching framework.
I have no problem with it as a SRFI, but I think it would be a
mistake for RnRS.