[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: regexp and valid-sre?
Implementing Emacs in Scheme is a use case for this.
On Nov 26, 2013 11:17 AM, "Michael Montague" <mikemon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 11/26/2013 10:24 AM, John Cowan wrote:
>> Michael Montague scripsit:
>> I don't think that these are strong arguments for having
>>> 'valid-sre?'. An implementation for which compiling is expensive,
>>> could easily internally do the "is it valid"-type check before
>>> compiling. Having it in the interface adds no functionality that is
>>> not already easily available.
>> It tells the compiler only to syntax-check and not go on to actually
>> compile. This is a very common feature in compilers: for example,
>> in gcc the -fsyntax-only option activates this mode. Sometimes
>> all you want to know at present is whether something is syntactically
> The only use case for 'valid-sre?' mentioned so far is Peter's interactive
> regular expression IDE. The C standard does not require the -fsyntax-only
> option. These do not seem like compelling arguments for including