Alex Shinn scripsit:
In that case I think there should be a unified system and the feature
> I actually need to separate the features better because things like
> "non-greedy" repetitions can actually be supported by non-backtracking
> implementations, "if" is just a shortcut for "or" with a look-ahead,
> and I have to think about whether it's possible for atomic/commit to
> be supported without backtracking.
> Ultimately with a little effort everything can be supported. One
> trick to support backreferences in DFA impls is to replace them with
> .* and use post-processing to verify. So it's more a matter of what's
> readily available, not what's possible.
mechanism should be abandoned.