[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: revised w/nocase text, considering titlecase and cased

This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 115 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 115 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.

Alex Shinn scripsit:

> Note that both (w/nocase upper) and (w/nocase lower)
> are effectively ways to access the Unicode "cased"
> property (L&), 

I don't think so, no, unless I misunderstand how "w/nocase" works.
Having case is not synonymous with being part of a casing pair: there
are lower case letters like ẗ (t with diaeresis) that have no upper
case equivalents, and the mathematical letters at U+1D400 et seqq. have
case but don't form casing pairs.

John Cowan          http://www.ccil.org/~cowan        cowan@xxxxxxxx
        Is it not written, "That which is written, is written"?