[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: "rx"

This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 115 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 115 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.



Alex Shinn scripsit:

> How about renaming it "submatch"?
> 
>   submatch?
>   submatch-string
>   submatch-start
>   submatch-end

I think that's confusing if you aren't actually using submatches.  I
would favor either switching to "match" (and no, I don't think
name collision is so important in this case), or using the explicit
form "regexp-result", which describes what the object actually is.

-- 
We do, doodley do, doodley do, doodley do,        John Cowan <cowan@xxxxxxxx>
What we must, muddily must, muddily must, muddily must; 
Muddily do, muddily do, muddily do, muddily do,    http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Until we bust, bodily bust, bodily bust, bodily bust.  --Bokonon