[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: regexp and valid-sre?
Michael Montague scripsit:
> I propose dropping the requirement that 'regexp' can be called with
> an already compiled <re>. It provides no additional functionality
> and it makes the specification of 'regexp' less clear.
It provides the ability to compile repeatedly used parts of regular
expressions. In a context where a large number of regular expressions
are in use that have factors in common, this can save a good deal of
time and possibly space.
Long-short-short, long-short-short / Dactyls in dimeter, John Cowan
Verse form with choriambs / (Masculine rhyme): cowan@xxxxxxxx
One sentence (two stanzas) / Hexasyllabically
Challenges poets who / Don't have the time. --robison who's at texas dot net