Mail Index
This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 103 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 103 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.
- Encoding Windows reserved charactes
- whoa
- Ikarus modified to use SRFIs 103 and 104
- Re: whoa
- Re: Encoding Windows reserved charactes
- Re: Encoding Windows reserved charactes
- Re: Encoding Windows reserved charactes
- Re: whoa
- Re: Encoding Windows reserved charactes
- Please drop the ^main^ thing
- Re: Please drop the ^main^ thing
- Re: Please drop the ^main^ thing
- Re: Please drop the ^main^ thing
- Re: Please drop the ^main^ thing
- Re: Please drop the ^main^ thing
- Re: Please drop the ^main^ thing
- Re: Please drop the ^main^ thing
- Re: Please drop the ^main^ thing
- Re: Please drop the ^main^ thing
- Re: Please drop the ^main^ thing
- Re: Please drop the ^main^ thing
- Re: Please drop the ^main^ thing
- five problems with this draft SRFI
- Re: Please drop the ^main^ thing
- Re: five problems with this draft SRFI
- Re: Please drop the ^main^ thing
- Re: Please drop the ^main^ thing
- Re: Please drop the ^main^ thing
- Re: Please drop the ^main^ thing
- Search Order
- Re: five problems with this draft SRFI
- Re: five problems with this draft SRFI
- Re: five problems with this draft SRFI
- Re: Please drop the ^main^ thing
- Re: Please drop the ^main^ thing
- Re: [OT] English
- Re: five problems with this draft SRFI
- Re: five problems with this draft SRFI
- Re: five problems with this draft SRFI
- Re: five problems with this draft SRFI
- Re: five problems with this draft SRFI
- Re: five problems with this draft SRFI
- Re: five problems with this draft SRFI
- Keeping the version in filenames
- Re: Keeping the version in filenames
- Re: Keeping the version in filenames
- Re: Keeping the version in filenames
- Re: Keeping the version in filenames
- Re: Keeping the version in filenames
- Re: Keeping the version in filenames
- Re: Keeping the version in filenames
- Bye-bye versioning
- Re: Keeping the version in filenames
- Re: Keeping the version in filenames
- whether #!identifiers are datums
- Plan for revising
- Re: Plan for revising
- Re: Plan for revising
- Re: Plan for revising
- Re: Plan for revising
- SRFI-59, SLIB, and SCHEME_LIBRARY_PATH
- Re: SRFI-59, SLIB, and SCHEME_LIBRARY_PATH
- Re: Plan for revising
- Re: Plan for revising
- Re: SRFI-59, SLIB, and SCHEME_LIBRARY_PATH
- Re: SRFI-59, SLIB, and SCHEME_LIBRARY_PATH
- Re: Plan for revising
- Re: SRFI-59, SLIB, and SCHEME_LIBRARY_PATH
- Re: SRFI-59, SLIB, and SCHEME_LIBRARY_PATH
- Re: Plan for revising
- Re: SRFI-59, SLIB, and SCHEME_LIBRARY_PATH
- dialect specificity [was: SRFI-59, SLIB, and SCHEME_LIBRARY_PATH]
- possible idea for substantial change [was: dialect specificity]
- Re: SRFI-59, SLIB, and SCHEME_LIBRARY_PATH
- Re: SRFI-59, SLIB, and SCHEME_LIBRARY_PATH
- compiled files [was: SRFI-59, SLIB, and SCHEME_LIBRARY_PATH]
- pre-computing paths [was: SRFI-59, SLIB, and SCHEME_LIBRARY_PATH]
- New revision of SRFI 103
- Re: pre-computing paths [was: SRFI-59, SLIB, and SCHEME_LIBRARY_PATH]
- Re: pre-computing paths [was: SRFI-59, SLIB, and SCHEME_LIBRARY_PATH]
- Revised draft of SRFI 103, 104
- Different dialects under the same root
- Re: Different dialects under the same root
- A utility for renaming old-style file names
- Re: Different dialects under the same root
- Re: Different extensions, and files in the same folder
- Re: A utility for renaming old-style file names
- why change the file name extension
- Re: A utility for renaming old-style file names
- Re: why change the file name extension
- Re: why change the file name extension
- upcoming revision, need feedback
- Re: upcoming revision, need feedback
- Re: upcoming revision, need feedback
- Continuing support for the sls extension
- Re: Continuing support for the sls extension
- Re: upcoming revision, need feedback
- Re: upcoming revision, need feedback
- Re: upcoming revision, need feedback
- Re: upcoming revision, need feedback
- Re: upcoming revision, need feedback
- Re: upcoming revision, need feedback
- Re: upcoming revision, need feedback
- Re: upcoming revision, need feedback
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
- a problem with terminology
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
- Re: a problem with terminology
- Re: a problem with terminology
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
- Re: upcoming revision, need feedback
- Re: upcoming revision, need feedback
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
- Re: a problem with terminology
- Re: upcoming revision, need feedback
- Re: a problem with terminology
- Re: upcoming revision, need feedback
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
- Re: upcoming revision, need feedback
- Re: upcoming revision, need feedback
- Re: upcoming revision, need feedback
- Re: upcoming revision, need feedback
- Re: upcoming revision, need feedback
- SRFIs 103, 104 updated and extended
- remaining issue: Windows-disallowed file names
- Character encoding
- Re: Character encoding
- remaining issue
- Re: remaining issue
- Re: remaining issue: Windows-disallowed file names
- Re: Character encoding
- Re: remaining issue: Windows-disallowed file names
- Re: remaining issue: Windows-disallowed file names
- Re: remaining issue: Windows-disallowed file names
- Re: remaining issue: Windows-disallowed file names
- Re: remaining issue: Windows-disallowed file names
- Re: remaining issues
- Re: remaining issues
- Re: remaining issues
- Re: remaining issues
- Re: remaining issues
- New revision of SRFI 103
- What to do with SRFI 103: Library Files?
- Re: What to do with SRFI 103: Library Files?
- re: rationale for no encoding
- re: messages missing from mail archive
- Re: What to do with SRFI 103: Library Files?
Mail converted by MHonArc