Mail Index
- Encoding Windows reserved charactes
- whoa
- Ikarus modified to use SRFIs 103 and 104
- Re: whoa
- Re: Encoding Windows reserved charactes
- Re: Encoding Windows reserved charactes
- Re: Encoding Windows reserved charactes
- Re: whoa
- Re: Encoding Windows reserved charactes
- Please drop the ^main^ thing
- Re: Please drop the ^main^ thing
- Re: Please drop the ^main^ thing
- Re: Please drop the ^main^ thing
- Re: Please drop the ^main^ thing
- Re: Please drop the ^main^ thing
- Re: Please drop the ^main^ thing
- Re: Please drop the ^main^ thing
- Re: Please drop the ^main^ thing
- Re: Please drop the ^main^ thing
- Re: Please drop the ^main^ thing
- Re: Please drop the ^main^ thing
- Re: Please drop the ^main^ thing
- five problems with this draft SRFI
- Re: Please drop the ^main^ thing
- Re: five problems with this draft SRFI
- Re: Please drop the ^main^ thing
- Re: Please drop the ^main^ thing
- Re: Please drop the ^main^ thing
- Re: Please drop the ^main^ thing
- Search Order
- Re: five problems with this draft SRFI
- Re: five problems with this draft SRFI
- Re: five problems with this draft SRFI
- Re: Please drop the ^main^ thing
- Re: Please drop the ^main^ thing
- Re: [OT] English
- Re: five problems with this draft SRFI
- Re: five problems with this draft SRFI
- Re: five problems with this draft SRFI
- Re: five problems with this draft SRFI
- Re: five problems with this draft SRFI
- Re: five problems with this draft SRFI
- Re: five problems with this draft SRFI
- Keeping the version in filenames
- Re: Keeping the version in filenames
- Re: Keeping the version in filenames
- Re: Keeping the version in filenames
- Re: Keeping the version in filenames
- Re: Keeping the version in filenames
- Re: Keeping the version in filenames
- Re: Keeping the version in filenames
- Bye-bye versioning
- Re: Keeping the version in filenames
- Re: Keeping the version in filenames
- whether #!identifiers are datums
- Plan for revising
- Re: Plan for revising
- Re: Plan for revising
- Re: Plan for revising
- Re: Plan for revising
- SRFI-59, SLIB, and SCHEME_LIBRARY_PATH
- Re: SRFI-59, SLIB, and SCHEME_LIBRARY_PATH
- Re: Plan for revising
- Re: Plan for revising
- Re: SRFI-59, SLIB, and SCHEME_LIBRARY_PATH
- Re: SRFI-59, SLIB, and SCHEME_LIBRARY_PATH
- Re: Plan for revising
- Re: SRFI-59, SLIB, and SCHEME_LIBRARY_PATH
- Re: SRFI-59, SLIB, and SCHEME_LIBRARY_PATH
- Re: Plan for revising
- Re: SRFI-59, SLIB, and SCHEME_LIBRARY_PATH
- dialect specificity [was: SRFI-59, SLIB, and SCHEME_LIBRARY_PATH]
- possible idea for substantial change [was: dialect specificity]
- Re: SRFI-59, SLIB, and SCHEME_LIBRARY_PATH
- Re: SRFI-59, SLIB, and SCHEME_LIBRARY_PATH
- compiled files [was: SRFI-59, SLIB, and SCHEME_LIBRARY_PATH]
- pre-computing paths [was: SRFI-59, SLIB, and SCHEME_LIBRARY_PATH]
- New revision of SRFI 103
- Re: pre-computing paths [was: SRFI-59, SLIB, and SCHEME_LIBRARY_PATH]
- Re: pre-computing paths [was: SRFI-59, SLIB, and SCHEME_LIBRARY_PATH]
- Revised draft of SRFI 103, 104
- Different dialects under the same root
- Re: Different dialects under the same root
- A utility for renaming old-style file names
- Re: Different dialects under the same root
- Re: Different extensions, and files in the same folder
- Re: A utility for renaming old-style file names
- why change the file name extension
- Re: A utility for renaming old-style file names
- Re: why change the file name extension
- Re: why change the file name extension
- upcoming revision, need feedback
- Re: upcoming revision, need feedback
- Re: upcoming revision, need feedback
- Continuing support for the sls extension
- Re: Continuing support for the sls extension
- Re: upcoming revision, need feedback
- Re: upcoming revision, need feedback
- Re: upcoming revision, need feedback
- Re: upcoming revision, need feedback
- Re: upcoming revision, need feedback
- Re: upcoming revision, need feedback
- Re: upcoming revision, need feedback
- Re: upcoming revision, need feedback
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
- a problem with terminology
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
- Re: a problem with terminology
- Re: a problem with terminology
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
- Re: upcoming revision, need feedback
- Re: upcoming revision, need feedback
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
- Re: a problem with terminology
- Re: upcoming revision, need feedback
- Re: a problem with terminology
- Re: upcoming revision, need feedback
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
- Re: upcoming revision, need feedback
- Re: upcoming revision, need feedback
- Re: upcoming revision, need feedback
- Re: upcoming revision, need feedback
- Re: upcoming revision, need feedback
- SRFIs 103, 104 updated and extended
- remaining issue: Windows-disallowed file names
- Character encoding
- Re: Character encoding
- remaining issue
- Re: remaining issue
- Re: remaining issue: Windows-disallowed file names
- Re: Character encoding
- Re: remaining issue: Windows-disallowed file names
- Re: remaining issue: Windows-disallowed file names
- Re: remaining issue: Windows-disallowed file names
- Re: remaining issue: Windows-disallowed file names
- Re: remaining issue: Windows-disallowed file names
- Re: remaining issues
- Re: remaining issues
- Re: remaining issues
- Re: remaining issues
- Re: remaining issues
- New revision of SRFI 103
- What to do with SRFI 103: Library Files?
- Re: What to do with SRFI 103: Library Files?
- re: rationale for no encoding
- re: messages missing from mail archive
- Re: What to do with SRFI 103: Library Files?
Mail converted by MHonArc