This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 103 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 103 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 22:45 -0400, Aubrey Jaffer wrote: > | From: Derick Eddington <derick.eddington@xxxxxxxxx> > | Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2009 13:23:45 -0700 > | > | On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 13:34 -0400, Aubrey Jaffer wrote: > | > SRFI-103 should have some text comparing SRFI-59 to SRFI-103 and > | > explaining why the conventions of SRFI-59 are inadequate to your goals > | > for SRFI-103. > | > | Thanks for pointing-out SRFI-59. I just read it for the first > | time. I need more time and sleep to think about it, but right now > | I'm thinking it probably is not a fit for this SRFI, and I probably > | can succinctly describe why in the document of this SRFI. I'll > | return to this topic. (Anyone, feel free to comment about this if > | you want while I wait.) > > I got a chance to look at SRFI-104, and SRFI-59 has relevance there. > I posted comments to srfi-104@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx I responded to those comments there. People interested in SRFI 103 may want to read my response because it relates to the design of SRFI 103. -- : Derick ----------------------------------------------------------------