[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Character encoding
- To: srfi-103 <srfi-103@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Character encoding
- From: Eduardo Cavazos <wayo.cavazos@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 07 Mar 2010 05:21:50 -0600
- Delivered-to: srfi-103@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:from:to:in-reply-to :references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer :content-transfer-encoding; bh=oPV8jbHqNWPvYu4TKccqVXONGJq5Skrm520IICxnVvg=; b=NWtikYWBhlinXbh+VQp6rG1BnUhbS6zQSWnuE5aAAZpKJDcSoXe2Ljearsw1PdsiHU iWH5rukhlAf4/lIVISF1odzyl4jD2AAlsvYdrfkzUsjYhYlMWKoel3jj6OpISC2tO9Sv MPW6626v8rh6nSg12pMXbqQISuxMzrHMiMA8w=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id :mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=r/r7ofKV2j0rnyxZA/S+UFFsYDfEmHlsoXAYjpfS0ollZHmkVsAYHxCRa8Hwk5BsTb H42j+Dg8g72ID51inV+HvngnmCXn2+OSom9b+aoY/CHbzNaCu6MJQuzaEDwOz74ZMG5G 5mOIkdh4OfRN8E9i6Z9brbsqSD7m23RPvuCQ4=
- In-reply-to: <1267914956.19059.125.camel@eep>
- References: <1267845838.2897.166.camel@dharmatech-laptop> <1267914956.19059.125.camel@eep>
On Sat, 2010-03-06 at 14:35 -0800, Derick Eddington wrote:
> > Currently, two implementations haven't committed at all to the current
> > SRFI naming convention: Chez and Ikarus.
>
> I don't know what you mean. They both support it.
I mean that they do not ship with SRFIs with names conformant to
SRFI-97. So changing the library names wouldn't affect them. Mosh,
Larceny, and Ypsilon do ship with SRFI-97 style SRFIs.
Ed