This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 103 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 103 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.
Derick Eddington wrote: > As you suggested, I want to convey that files conforming to this SRFI > must have only one library per file, and that Scheme systems which > implement this SRFI are free to support files which do not conform to > this SRFI. Thanks! I greatly appreciate that clarification. By the way, my remark about the one-to-infinite nature of the mapping from library names to file names assumed that implementations were supposed to search all of the potentially infinite file names whose version numbers might match. From your remark that the mapping is only one-to-many but not one-to-infinite, I infer that systems don't have to search for file names that include version numbers, but I'm not certain of that conclusion. Please advise. Will