[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: five problems with this draft SRFI

This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 103 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 103 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.

Derick Eddington wrote:
> As you suggested, I want to convey that files conforming to this SRFI
> must have only one library per file, and that Scheme systems which
> implement this SRFI are free to support files which do not conform to
> this SRFI.

Thanks!  I greatly appreciate that clarification.

By the way, my remark about the one-to-infinite nature
of the mapping from library names to file names assumed
that implementations were supposed to search all of the
potentially infinite file names whose version numbers
might match.  From your remark that the mapping is only
one-to-many but not one-to-infinite, I infer that systems
don't have to search for file names that include version
numbers, but I'm not certain of that conclusion.  Please