[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: remaining issue: Windows-disallowed file names
- To: srfi-103@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: remaining issue: Windows-disallowed file names
- From: Derick Eddington <derick.eddington@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 07 Mar 2010 18:26:25 -0800
- Delivered-to: srfi-103@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:from:to:in-reply-to :references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer :content-transfer-encoding; bh=fdMnzdbsjhh48pqebAq2sXR+zeGfcuoOgKVHPx8bIz4=; b=kUGRt97ISEfyMEM7o9O2iP7i07t1yOC1gKbzrPDBJpv5fq/9KEAmeA/it6WbXpdgqs AZLVhBj6b4srWHj7rhEi9KmHvQD7tO99wCc7VDhEyGPyHBmUkDhreaH+I+sv+3W9KHii 3KWhJlQM1JxoyJ+ocIkJW5gHblUbD4IgKoy+A=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id :mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=wWBAvFe4QLqIljlEgA5lVH7Dy6f/6WFf7ZqJRVgWHk0KpNuTHI96LaKfjzEBc8a30O UdmgQqW0b38Guq0G48ZtHTxc2aEN5uPH4zanvFrkmWv8/omEbHhxiquQPlGP4ViTH4/c H/rfwicWVyKPhhcSNhVFqSVcSkc9owFCtopSc=
- In-reply-to: <1268013838.23559.217.camel@eep>
- References: <1267837572.12814.109.camel@eep> <201003070545.o275jjtC014624@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1268013838.23559.217.camel@eep>
On Sun, 2010-03-07 at 18:04 -0800, Derick Eddington wrote:
> I think it's clearly better to not restrict library names *and* to have
> portability with Windows (because I think it'll help Scheme adoption),
> via an encoding design which will die when Windows does and which won't
> be used much.
To clarify, what I mean is it won't be seen or dealt with much by
clients of libraries.
--
: Derick
----------------------------------------------------------------