[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: five problems with this draft SRFI
This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 103 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 103 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.
- To: William D Clinger <will@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: five problems with this draft SRFI
- From: Derick Eddington <derick.eddington@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 20:51:46 -0700
- Cc: srfi-103@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: srfi-103@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:from:to:cc :in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version :x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; bh=mZKZNIjIt3dGnzzXoAk57MZ2o9HvqTCUJFsTGUXMNzs=; b=t2gVnUbWuXSXnuDLE6tKebc/djliY5rmbvNggA8yxY//iLHPAwc3j/rnVOTXQp7yC8 jxr4Lg1TKp8wVR18Nzc+TgCD6n9Ped8oWMadR3nrwxPRADwauBYeQog0twjDNkF/5HeE EI9Wr/jTDQTtR790KmwWrRWG7G0iYxgRw9fFE=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date :message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=HNBpMshOpt+tNAbWBHybqJMhpVObSZwB5tR+K3zB64S8rAY0TpdWYuOHdneBo5nUj4 CSvxCOuIwAtZ+Jc0PYhglVOfsegax6tEfZ5WTHYMBEmNftM+1EIFUD7yDnBxVPd8rakD /ekwHP1MFLV54SbZsX6W1xPT32P9LXXeN6xPM=
- In-reply-to: <1254280946.7802.298.camel@eep>
- References: <20791565.807631254275322110.JavaMail.root@zimbra> <1254280946.7802.298.camel@eep>
On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 20:22 -0700, Derick Eddington wrote:
> Library references, because of their version references, in the current
> draft SRFI, can have a one-to-infinite mapping to file names. Yes, this
> requires searching through all the theoretically possibly infinite file
> names which might match. This searching is done by listing the entries
> in the directories where matching files could be, and filtering-out the
> non-matches, and possibly sorting the matches according to the ordering
> of the current draft.
Note that the current draft SRFI allows this searching to stop as soon
as a match has been found. Additional matches could theoretically exist
which would be found if the search continued after finding the first
match. Implementations which want to do more sophisticated version
constraint handling can continue searching (because other versions might
be available) if the first match does not work-out (because of some
other version constraints).
--
: Derick
----------------------------------------------------------------