Mail Index

• Thread Index

• inlined "here" strings
  • From: Ray Blaak
• forcing delimiters after escapes in quoted strings
  • From: Ray Blaak
• Response to SRFI 75.
  • From: bear
• Re: forcing delimiters after escapes in quoted strings
  • From: bear
• Re: Response to SRFI 75.
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Re: Response to SRFI 75.
  • From: bear
• explicit quoting/unquoting of strings
  • From: Sebastian Egner
• here strings and symbols
  • From: Sebastian Egner
• Re: Response to SRFI 75.
  • From: Sebastian Egner
• Re: inlined "here" strings
  • From: Matthew Flatt
• Re: forcing delimiters after escapes in quoted strings
  • From: Matthew Flatt
• Re: forcing delimiters after escapes in quoted strings
  • From: Matthew Flatt
• Re: here strings and symbols
  • From: Matthew Flatt
• Re: explicit quoting/unquoting of strings
  • From: Matthew Flatt
• Re: Response to SRFI 75.
  • From: Matthew Flatt
• Re: forcing delimiters after escapes in quoted strings
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Typo
  • From: Emilio Lopes
• Re: Typo
  • From: Matthew Flatt
• Re: here strings and symbols
  • From: Sebastian Egner
• Re: here strings and symbols
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Re: here strings and symbols
  • From: bear
• Re: forcing delimiters after escapes in quoted strings
  • From: bear
• Unicode hex representation length restrictions
  • From: bear
• Typos
  • From: bburger
• Re: Unicode hex representation length restrictions
  • From: bear
• naming comments
  • From: Alex Shinn
• case mappings
  • From: Alex Shinn
• Re: case mappings
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: case mappings
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Re: inlined "here" strings
  • From: Ray Blaak
• Re: forcing delimiters after escapes in quoted strings
  • From: Ray Blaak
• Re: case mappings
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: case mappings
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Re: case mappings
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: case mappings
  • From: Alex Shinn
• Re: case mappings
  • From: Alex Shinn
• Re: here strings and symbols
  • From: Sebastian Egner
• unicode names of scalar values
  • From: Sebastian Egner
• Re: forcing delimiters after escapes in quoted strings
  • From: Matthew Flatt
• Re: Typos
  • From: Matthew Flatt
• Re: Unicode hex representation length restrictions
  • From: Matthew Flatt
• Re: naming comments
  • From: Matthew Flatt
• Re: case mappings
  • From: Matthew Flatt
• Re: here strings and symbols
  • From: Michael Sperber
• encoding strings in memory
  • From: bburger
• Re: here strings and symbols
  • From: Sebastian Egner
• Re: inlined "here" strings
  • From: bburger
• Re: naming comments
  • From: bear
• Re: encoding strings in memory
  • From: Per Bothner
• Re: case mappings
  • From: bear
• constant-time access to variable-width encodings
  • From: Per Bothner
• Re: constant-time access to variable-width encodings
  • From: Ray Blaak
• Re: case mappings
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: case mappings
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: case mappings
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Fundamental operations on strings
  • From: Shiro Kawai
• Re: constant-time access to variable-width encodings
  • From: Shiro Kawai
• Re: constant-time access to variable-width encodings
  • From: Per Bothner
• Re: constant-time access to variable-width encodings
  • From: Shiro Kawai
• Re: Fundamental operations on strings
  • From: bear
• Re: constant-time access to variable-width encodings
  • From: bear
• Re: constant-time access to variable-width encodings
  • From: Per Bothner
• Re: constant-time access to variable-width encodings
  • From: bear
• Re: case mappings
  • From: Alex Shinn
• Re: case mappings
  • From: Alex Shinn
• Re: here strings and symbols
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Re: inlined "here" strings
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Re: case mappings
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: constant-time access to variable-width encodings
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: constant-time access to variable-width encodings
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: constant-time access to variable-width encodings
  • From: Sebastian Egner
• Re: here strings and symbols
  • From: Sebastian Egner
• Re: case mappings
  • From: Alex Shinn
• Re: case mappings
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: case mappings
  • From: Alex Shinn
• Re: inlined "here" strings
  • From: Ray Blaak
• Re: case mappings
  • From: bear
• Re: case mappings
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: case mappings
  • From: bear
• Various opinions
  • From: Jorgen Schaefer
• Re: case mappings
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: Various opinions
  • From: bear
• A short comment
  • From: Eric Knauel
• collation algorithm
  • From: bear
• the discussion so far
  • From: Matthew Flatt
• Re: the discussion so far
  • From: Jorgen Schaefer
• Re: the discussion so far
  • From: Matthew Flatt
• Re: the discussion so far
  • From: Jorgen Schaefer
• Re: collation algorithm
  • From: John.Cowan
• Re: the discussion so far
  • From: bear
• Here strings?
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer
• Re: the discussion so far
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: the discussion so far
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: the discussion so far
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: the discussion so far
  • From: Jorgen Schaefer
• Re: the discussion so far
  • From: John.Cowan
• Re: Here strings?
  • From: John.Cowan
• Re: the discussion so far
  • From: John.Cowan
• Re: Here strings?
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer
• Re: Here strings?
  • From: Anton van Straaten
• Re: Here strings?
  • From: John.Cowan
• Re: the discussion so far
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: Here strings?
  • From: Anton van Straaten
• Re: the discussion so far
  • From: John.Cowan
• Re: the discussion so far
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: the discussion so far
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Re: the discussion so far
  • From: John.Cowan
• Re: the discussion so far
  • From: John.Cowan
• Re: the discussion so far
  • From: Jorgen Schaefer
• Re: the discussion so far
  • From: John.Cowan
• A different approach
  • From: Thomas Lord
• Re: the discussion so far
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: the discussion so far
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: the discussion so far
  • From: Alex Shinn
• Re: A different approach
  • From: felix winkelmann
• Re: A different approach
  • From: Jens Axel Søgaard
• Re: A different approach
  • From: felix winkelmann
• Re: A different approach
  • From: Jens Axel Søgaard
• Re: the discussion so far
  • From: bear
• Re: the discussion so far
  • From: John.Cowan
• Re: the discussion so far
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: the discussion so far
  • From: John.Cowan
• Re: the discussion so far
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• on waste-of-time arguments....
  • From: Thomas Lord
• Re: the discussion so far
  • From: bear
• Re: the discussion so far
  • From: Alex Shinn
• words, punctuation, and whitespace
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer
• Re: the discussion so far
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: on waste-of-time arguments....
  • From: John.Cowan
• Re: on waste-of-time arguments....
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: words, punctuation, and whitespace
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: the discussion so far
  • From: Alex Shinn
• Re: the discussion so far
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: words, punctuation, and whitespace
  • From: Alex Shinn
• Re: the discussion so far
  • From: Alex Shinn
• Re: the discussion so far
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: the discussion so far
  • From: John.Cowan
• Re: words, punctuation, and whitespace
  • From: John.Cowan
• Re: the discussion so far
  • From: John.Cowan
• Re: the discussion so far
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: on waste-of-time arguments....
  • From: John.Cowan
• Re: on waste-of-time arguments....
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: the discussion so far
  • From: John.Cowan
• Re: on waste-of-time arguments....
  • From: John.Cowan
• Re: the discussion so far
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: the discussion so far
  • From: John.Cowan
• Re: on waste-of-time arguments....
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: A different approach
  • From: felix winkelmann
• Re: A different approach
  • From: Jens Axel Søgaard
• Re: the discussion so far
  • From: bear
• Question marks on comparisons
  • From: David Van Horn
• Re: on waste-of-time arguments....
  • From: Thomas Lord
• Re: Question marks on comparisons
  • From: John.Cowan
• picking names for functions
  • From: Thomas Lord
• Re: the discussion so far
  • From: John.Cowan
• Re: the discussion so far
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: the discussion so far
  • From: John.Cowan
• Re: picking names for functions
  • From: bear
• Re: the discussion so far
  • From: bear
• Titlecase
  • From: John.Cowan
• Re: the discussion so far
  • From: Alex Shinn
• Re: Titlecase
  • From: David Van Horn
• Re: the discussion so far
  • From: John.Cowan
• Re: Titlecase
  • From: Alex Shinn
• Re: Titlecase
  • From: John.Cowan
• Re: Titlecase
  • From: John.Cowan
• Re: constant-time access to variable-width encodings
  • From: William D Clinger
• Does this change identifiers (variables) or only symbols?
  • From: Keith Wright
• Re: the discussion so far
  • From: bear
• Re: Does this change identifiers (variables) or only symbols?
  • From: bear
• Re: Does this change identifiers (variables) or only symbols?
  • From: John.Cowan
• A proposal for reserved read-syntax characters
  • From: John.Cowan
• unsubscribe
  • From: mashley
• Re: A proposal for reserved read-syntax characters
  • From: Jorgen Schaefer
• Re: A proposal for reserved read-syntax characters
  • From: John.Cowan
• Re: A proposal for reserved read-syntax characters
  • From: bear
• Re: A proposal for reserved read-syntax characters
  • From: Jorgen Schaefer
• Re: A proposal for reserved read-syntax characters
  • From: bear
• Re: A proposal for reserved read-syntax characters
  • From: Jorgen Schaefer
• new draft
  • From: Matthew Flatt
• re: A proposal for reserved read-syntax characters
  • From: Thomas Lord
• Re: A proposal for reserved read-syntax characters
  • From: John.Cowan
• the "Unicode Background" section
  • From: Thomas Lord
• Re: A proposal for reserved read-syntax characters
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: the "Unicode Background" section
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: the "Unicode Background" section
  • From: Matthew Flatt
• Re: new draft
  • From: Jorgen Schaefer
• Re: the "Unicode Background" section
  • From: Thomas Lord
• Re: the "Unicode Background" section
  • From: John.Cowan
• Surrogates and character representation
  • From: Tom Emerson
• Re: Surrogates and character representation
  • From: John.Cowan
• Re: new draft
  • From: John.Cowan
• Re: Surrogates and character representation
  • From: Tom Emerson
• Re: the "Unicode Background" section
  • From: Matthew Flatt
• Re: the "Unicode Background" section
  • From: Alex Shinn
• Re: A different approach
  • From: felix winkelmann
• Re: A different approach
  • From: John.Cowan
• Re: the "Unicode Background" section
  • From: bear
• Re: the "Unicode Background" section
  • From: Tom Emerson
• Re: new draft
  • From: bear
• Re: the "Unicode Background" section
  • From: Thomas Lord
• Re: the "Unicode Background" section
  • From: Thomas Lord
• Re: the "Unicode Background" section
  • From: Thomas Lord
• Re: the "Unicode Background" section
  • From: Alan Watson
• suggested rule of thumb for editors
  • From: Thomas Lord
• Re: the "Unicode Background" section
  • From: John.Cowan
• Re: the "Unicode Background" section
  • From: Thomas Lord
• Re: the "Unicode Background" section
  • From: Shiro Kawai
• Re: the "Unicode Background" section
  • From: Shiro Kawai
• Re: the discussion so far
  • From: bear
• Predicate endings
  • From: bear
• Re: new draft
  • From: Jorgen Schaefer
• Re: the "Unicode Background" section
  • From: John.Cowan
• Re: Surrogates and character representation
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: the "Unicode Background" section
  • From: John.Cowan
• Re: Surrogates and character representation
  • From: Tom Emerson
• Re: Surrogates and character representation
  • From: Thomas Lord
• Re: the "Unicode Background" section
  • From: Thomas Lord
• Re: the "Unicode Background" section
  • From: John.Cowan
• Re: Surrogates and character representation
  • From: John.Cowan
• Re: Surrogates and character representation
  • From: Shiro Kawai
• Re: Surrogates and character representation
  • From: Ken Dickey
• Re: Surrogates and character representation
  • From: Michael Sperber
• Re: Surrogates and character representation
  • From: Tom Emerson
• Re: Surrogates and character representation
  • From: Alan Watson
• Re: Surrogates and character representation
  • From: Tom Emerson
• Re: Surrogates and character representation
  • From: Alan Watson
• Re: Surrogates and character representation
  • From: Per Bothner
• Re: Surrogates and character representation
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: Surrogates and character representation
  • From: Tom Emerson
• Re: Surrogates and character representation
  • From: John.Cowan
• Re: Surrogates and character representation
  • From: John.Cowan
• Re: Surrogates and character representation
  • From: Per Bothner
• Re: A different approach
  • From: felix winkelmann
• Re: Surrogates and character representation
  • From: Alan Watson
• Re: Does this change identifiers (variables) or only symbols?
  • From: Keith Wright
• Re: Surrogates and character representation
  • From: William D Clinger
• Re: Surrogates and character representation
  • From: Tom Emerson
• Re: Surrogates and character representation
  • From: bear
• Re: Surrogates and character representation
  • From: John.Cowan
• Re: Surrogates and character representation
  • From: Alan Watson
• Re: Surrogates and character representation
  • From: Thomas Lord
• Re: Surrogates and character representation
  • From: John.Cowan
• Re: Surrogates and character representation
  • From: Thomas Lord
• Re: Surrogates and character representation
  • From: Alan Watson
• Re: Surrogates and character representation
  • From: Per Bothner
• Re: Surrogates and character representation
  • From: Alex Shinn
• Re: Surrogates and character representation
  • From: Alex Shinn
• Re: Surrogates and character representation
  • From: Tom Emerson
• Re: Surrogates and character representation
  • From: Alex Shinn
• Re: Surrogates and character representation
  • From: Tom Emerson
• Re: Surrogates and character representation
  • From: Per Bothner
• Re: Surrogates and character representation
  • From: Tom Emerson
• Re: Surrogates and character representation
  • From: William D Clinger
• Re: Surrogates and character representation
  • From: John Cowan
• Re: Surrogates and character representation
  • From: Alex Shinn
• Re: Surrogates and character representation
  • From: bear
• Re: Surrogates and character representation
  • From: Shiro Kawai
• Re: Surrogates and character representation
  • From: Alex Shinn
• Re: Surrogates and character representation
  • From: Per Bothner
• Re: Surrogates and character representation
  • From: Tom Emerson
• Re: Surrogates and character representation
  • From: Alan Watson
• Allowing ASCII only, string escapes, and normalization
  • From: Jorgen Schaefer
• Re: Allowing ASCII only, string escapes, and normalization
  • From: John.Cowan
• Re: Surrogates and character representation
  • From: bear
• Re: freshman-level Boyer-Moore fast string search
  • From: Alex Shinn
• Re: freshman-level Boyer-Moore fast string search
  • From: Alex Shinn
• Re: Surrogates and character representation
  • From: William D Clinger
• Re: Surrogates and character representation
  • From: William D Clinger
• freshman-level Boyer-Moore fast string search
  • From: William D Clinger
• Re: freshman-level Boyer-Moore fast string search
  • From: William D Clinger
• Re: freshman-level Boyer-Moore fast string search
  • From: William D Clinger
• Re: Surrogates and character representation
  • From: Per Bothner
• Re: freshman-level Boyer-Moore fast string search
  • From: Alex Shinn
• Re: freshman-level Boyer-Moore fast string search
  • From: Per Bothner
• Re: Surrogates and character representation
  • From: Per Bothner
• Re: freshman-level Boyer-Moore fast string search
  • From: Per Bothner
• Re: freshman-level Boyer-Moore fast string search
  • From: Alex Shinn
• Re: Surrogates and character representation
  • From: William D Clinger
• Re: freshman-level Boyer-Moore fast string search
  • From: William D Clinger
• Re: Surrogates and character representation
  • From: Alex Shinn
• Re: freshman-level Boyer-Moore fast string search
  • From: Alan Watson
• Re: Surrogates and character representation
  • From: Alan Watson
• Normalization vs. grapheme clusters
  • From: John.Cowan
• Re: freshman-level Boyer-Moore fast string search
  • From: William D Clinger
• Line-feed required for a line termination?
  • From: Jorgen Schaefer
• Re: Line-feed required for a line termination?
  • From: Per Bothner
• thank you for the symbol extensions
  • From: Panu Kalliokoski
• String lexical syntax
  • From: Ben Goetter
• Unicode surrogates
  • From: rgburger
• Re: Unicode surrogates
  • From: Tom Emerson
• Re: Unicode surrogates
  • From: John Cowan
• Re: Unicode surrogates
  • From: Robby Findler
• Re: Unicode surrogates
  • From: bear
• Re: Unicode surrogates
  • From: Per Bothner
• Re: Unicode surrogates
  • From: Tom Emerson
• うえやま　みなこ
  • From: reiko
• Re: Unicode surrogates
  • From: bear
• Issues with Unicode
  • From: Jonathan S. Shapiro
• Re: Issues with Unicode
  • From: Marc Feeley
• Re: Issues with Unicode
  • From: Shiro Kawai
• Re: Issues with Unicode
  • From: Taylor R. Campbell
• Re: Issues with Unicode
  • From: Shiro Kawai
• Re: Issues with Unicode
  • From: Jorgen Schaefer
• Re: Issues with Unicode
  • From: Sebastian Egner
• Re: Issues with Unicode
  • From: John Cowan
• Re: Issues with Unicode
  • From: Taylor R. Campbell
• Re: Issues with Unicode
  • From: John Cowan
• Re: Issues with Unicode
  • From: John Cowan
• Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?
  • From: bear
• Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?
  • From: John Cowan
• Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?
  • From: Jorgen Schaefer
• SRFI withdrawn; comments on the possible future
  • From: Matthew Flatt
• Re: SRFI withdrawn; comments on the possible future
  • From: Alex Shinn
• Re: SRFI withdrawn; comments on the possible future
  • From: bear
• Re: SRFI withdrawn; comments on the possible future
  • From: Jorgen Schaefer
• Re: SRFI withdrawn; comments on the possible future
  • From: John Cowan