This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 75 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 75 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.
bear <bear@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > It could be done that way, I guess, provided that > > (eq? sym (string->symbol(symbol->string sym))) -> #t > > for all symbols is preserved. Yes, that's a requirement. > But honestly, I don't want to > specify case-folding in a character set that makes case-folding > as hairy as Unicode does. As I said, the standard should neither require nor prohibit case-folding.