bear <bear@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > It could be done that way, I guess, provided that > > (eq? sym (string->symbol(symbol->string sym))) -> #t > > for all symbols is preserved. Yes, that's a requirement. > But honestly, I don't want to > specify case-folding in a character set that makes case-folding > as hairy as Unicode does. As I said, the standard should neither require nor prohibit case-folding.