This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 75 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 75 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.
On Wed, 20 Jul 2005, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: >Always a good point, and I can say that I am very much in agreement >with the outlines of what you have proposed below. > >My only quibble (and it is minor minor minor) is that "UCA" might well >be an opaque term to many reading the standard. How about >"human-readable" or some other tag instead? Meh. I'm not particularly attached to the names, although I'd be annoyed at a tag so very long as that. It's the functions that I believe we need, and we need standard names for them. If they're included, by any fixed names, in the standard, I'll be happy. Bear