This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 75 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 75 are here. Eventually, the entire history will be moved there, including any new messages.
Matthew Flatt <mflatt@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > A new draft of the SRFI is on the web page. Thanks a lot! With all the Unicode knowledge combined on this list, I think it would be worthwhile to focus on a single goal now: Find places in the proposal that either would make it difficult to implement a high-level Unicode API on top of it, or that would make it difficult for implementations to stick to ASCII. Just as an example, implementing a string API based on grapheme clusters (or abstract characters, which I think most people here mean) on top of codepoint vectors is not much of a problem. After we removed any such problems, we can focus on removing any remaining issue listed in the document. Greetings, -- Jorgen -- ((email . "forcer@xxxxxxxxx") (www . "http://www.forcix.cx/") (gpg . "1024D/028AF63C") (irc . "nick forcer on IRCnet"))