[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: new draft
Matthew Flatt <mflatt@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> A new draft of the SRFI is on the web page.
Thanks a lot!
With all the Unicode knowledge combined on this list, I think it
would be worthwhile to focus on a single goal now: Find places in
the proposal that either would make it difficult to implement a
high-level Unicode API on top of it, or that would make it
difficult for implementations to stick to ASCII.
Just as an example, implementing a string API based on grapheme
clusters (or abstract characters, which I think most people here
mean) on top of codepoint vectors is not much of a problem.
After we removed any such problems, we can focus on removing any
remaining issue listed in the document.
((email . "forcer@xxxxxxxxx") (www . "http://www.forcix.cx/")
(gpg . "1024D/028AF63C") (irc . "nick forcer on IRCnet"))